H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Damir Keretic vs Shlomo Glickstein H2H: 0-1
Shlomo Glickstein holds a 1–0 lead over Damir Keretic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shlomo Glickstein leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shlomo Glickstein won the 1983 Lisbon fourth round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 68
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1983* | Lisbon | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Shlomo Glickstein | 6-0 6-3 | Damir Keretic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shlomo Glickstein | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,864 | 159 | 147 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Damir Keretic | Shlomo Glickstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #65 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #34 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #33 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #42 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #167 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #284 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #797 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |