H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Damir Keretic vs Tim Gullikson H2H: 1-0

Damir Keretic holds a 1–0 lead over Tim Gullikson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1986 Miami Open round of 64 6-1 6-2.

GER Age 66 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Damir Keretic #90 6-1 6-2 Tim Gullikson Match data Feb 12, 1986* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Damir Keretic #837 #58 35 1,741 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tim Gullikson 2,012 0 0 0 0 4 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Damir Keretic Tim Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1979 1–2 33.3% #400 1,496 0 0
20 1980 3–7 30.0% #239 1,477 0 0
21 1981 3–6 33.3% 1,476 0 0
22 1982 15–17 46.9% #69 1,618 0 0
23 1983 7–17 29.2% #86 1,528 0 0
24 1984 7–8 46.7% #143 1,574 0 0
25 1985 12–15 44.4% #85 1,595 0 0
26 1986 16–14 53.3% #68 1,687 0 0
27 1987 13–15 46.4% #109 1,694 0 0
28 1988 7–17 29.2% #207 1,537 0 0
29 1989 3–2 60.0% #412 1,575 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Damir Keretic Tim Gullikson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1982 12 15 27 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 6 6 12 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1977 12 5 17 70.6% 10 9 19 52.6% 18 3 21 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
26 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 15 6 21 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
27 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1979 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 10 26 61.5%
28 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1980 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
29 1989 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 8 14 42.9%
30 1982 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 11 14 21.4%
31 1983 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 1984 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7%
33 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 9 21 30 30.0% 66 82 148 44.6% 7 11 18 38.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 95 70 165 57.6% 29 32 61 47.5% 54 33 87 62.1% 64 62 126 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Damir Keretic Tim Gullikson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1979 1496 100.4 28.6% -1.86 1–0 1–1 +0.34
20 1980 1477 97.2 +53 +20 33.3% -1.17 2–2 (50%) 1–1 +1.39
21 1981 1477 122.8 +42 40.9% -0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 +0.85
22 1982 1618 125.5 +10 -32 46.0% -0.31 9–5 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 103.9 +2.82
23 1983 1528 123.9 -63 +44 39.3% -0.79 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 96.0 +0.53 1975 1526 110.0 +36 37.5% -1.38 2–2 (50%) 1–0 -0.56
24 1984 1574 127.4 +56 -12 43.8% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 2–0 +0.03 1976 1587 121.0 -10 -24 -68 42.9% -0.56 2–6 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.4 +0.27
25 1985 1596 124.5 +29 -45 44.6% -0.34 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 +1.43 1977 1869 146.4 -101 -197 0 62.5% +0.89 15–7 (68%) 6–5 (55%) 112.6 +0.69
26 1986 1688 134.4 -143 +52 48.1% -0.22 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 111.3 -1.30 1978 1956 150.8 +44 -254 -114 58.9% +0.42 9–5 (64%) 15–10 (60%) 108.5 -1.31
27 1987 1694 139.5 -177 +69 -181 47.8% -0.07 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) 103.2 -1.52 1979 1983 152.5 +53 -246 -92 58.0% +0.51 14–2 (88%) 12–6 (67%) 111.6 -2.02
28 1988 1538 120.7 -47 +102 35.4% -0.81 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.6 -0.37 1980 1880 148.3 +25 +22 56.7% +0.43 8–9 (47%) 10–11 (48%) 94.1 -3.86
29 1989 1576 113.3 -37 52.9% +0.24 1–0 2–1 (67%) +0.44 1981 1868 150.9 +30 -139 -33 55.2% +0.51 9–6 (60%) 9–12 (43%) 98.3 -4.50
30 1982 1729 145.3 +53 +39 41.8% -0.47 7–8 (47%) 7–14 (33%) 92.5 -3.75
31 1983 1759 134.2 +16 -67 +54 54.9% +0.15 6–8 (43%) 12–6 (67%) 99.5 +0.12
32 1984 1613 132.9 +12 +73 +194 41.2% -0.58 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 97.8 -1.08
33 1985 1585 121.6 +9 +164 43.5% -0.26 2–4 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 94.1 +0.41
34 1986 1583 108.2 -10 22.2% -1.89 2–1 (67%) -0.44
Career 1741 133.5 -76 +45 -60 43.3% -0.44 34–35 (49%) 34–32 (52%) 105.0 +2.24 2013 149.8 +23 -151 +14 53.2% +0.20 79–65 (55%) 83–78 (52%) 102.3 -3.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.