H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Dan Cassidy vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 1-2
Joakim Nystrom holds a 2–1 lead over Dan Cassidy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Joakim Nystrom leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dan Cassidy won the 1988 Orlando third round 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 1988* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Dan Cassidy | 6-0 7-6 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data |
| Dec 2, 1984* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Joakim Nystrom | 7-6 6-4 6-3 | Dan Cassidy | Match data |
| Aug 26, 1984* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Joakim Nystrom | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | Dan Cassidy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Cassidy | #753 | #74 | 187 | 1,629 | 35 | 75 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,114 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dan Cassidy | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 8 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1984 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,912 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1986 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,729 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1988 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,402 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |