Dan Cassidy
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Tim Wilkison | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Darren Cahill | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Joakim Nystrom | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 10, 1988 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 15, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Joakim Nystrom holds a 2–1 lead over Dan Cassidy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Joakim Nystrom leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dan Cassidy won the 1988 Orlando round of 32 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Cassidy | 6-0 7-6 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data | Mar 10, 1988* | R32 | Orlando | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Joakim Nystrom | 7-6 6-4 6-3 | Dan Cassidy | Match data | Dec 2, 1984* | R32 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Joakim Nystrom | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | Dan Cassidy | Match data | Aug 26, 1984* | QF | Cincinnati Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Cassidy | #753 | #74 | 187 | 1,629 | 35 | 75 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,121 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Dan Cassidy | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,565 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 1988 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,943 | 0 | 7 |
| 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,926 | 0 | 12 |
| 1990 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,401 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 13 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,730 | 0 | 13 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Dan Cassidy | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1969 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1985 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1982 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1986 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 30 | 10 | 40 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 1988 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1985 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% |
| 1989 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1986 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% |
| 1990 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | 23 | 41 | 64 | 35.9% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | Career | 60 | 31 | 91 | 65.9% | 138 | 70 | 208 | 66.3% | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 36 | 23 | 59 | 61.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Dan Cassidy | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1969 | 1486 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 | 1980 | 1492 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 1984 | 1630 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | -17 | — | +2 | 58.3% | +0.25 | 3–3 (50%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | +1.87 | 1981 | 1645 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | -78 | +23 | -103 | 46.8% | -0.24 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–5 (0%) | — | -0.49 |
| 1985 | 1510 | 112.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -19 | +47 | 31.4% | -1.29 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–8 (33%) | — | +0.61 | 1982 | 1618 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +115 | — | 43.5% | -0.32 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | -0.22 |
| 1986 | 1512 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +35 | — | 30.0% | -1.20 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -0.59 | 1983 | 1868 | 149.9 | — | — | — | — | -235 | -70 | -111 | 63.6% | +0.95 | 10–5 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.17 |
| 1987 | 1565 | 111.6 | — | — | — | — | -9 | -18 | — | 47.1% | -0.23 | 3–0 (100%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.25 | 1984 | 1969 | 153.9 | — | — | — | — | -39 | -15 | -234 | 65.1% | +0.98 | 19–4 (83%) | 15–8 (65%) | — | -0.15 |
| 1988 | 1515 | 119.8 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -24 | — | 29.2% | -1.37 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | -0.50 | 1985 | 1943 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +26 | -150 | 65.8% | +1.19 | 12–9 (57%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | +0.33 |
| 1989 | 1457 | 105.2 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 37.8% | -1.13 | 0–6 (0%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.90 | 1986 | 1926 | 163.8 | — | — | — | — | +108 | +4 | -113 | 70.2% | +1.58 | 13–7 (65%) | 11–5 (69%) | — | -0.15 |
| 1990 | 1402 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | — | 12.5% | -2.44 | 0–2 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.08 | 1987 | 1880 | 153.1 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +138 | -78 | 62.8% | +0.97 | 9–5 (64%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | -0.40 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1730 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +142 | +66 | 47.5% | +0.11 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -1.25 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1608 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | +49 | +152 | — | 30.8% | -1.92 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.53 |
| Career | 1630 | 118.6 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -6 | +20 | 36.1% | -1.01 | 12–20 (38%) | 19–26 (42%) | 94.0 | +2.31 | Career | 2121 | 156.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +44 | -117 | 60.9% | +0.82 | 76–41 (65%) | 57–41 (58%) | 108.6 | -0.43 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Annacone | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Tim Wilkison | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 6, 1988 | H2H |
| Darren Cahill | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 28, 1988 | H2H |
| Joakim Nystrom | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 10, 1988 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 15, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 12 | 13 | Aug 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 4 | 6 | 10 | Aug 31, 1988 | H2H |
| Henrik Sundstrom | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jun 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 6 | 7 | Apr 23, 1988 | H2H |
| Miloslav Mecir | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 6, 1986 | H2H |