H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Dan Cassidy vs John Frawley H2H: 1-0

Dan Cassidy holds a 1–0 lead over John Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dan Cassidy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dan Cassidy won the 1984 Melbourne round of 32 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dan Cassidy
USA Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
John Frawley
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dan Cassidy #126 6-4 6-3 John Frawley Match data Dec 27, 1984* R32 Melbourne ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dan Cassidy #753 #74 187 1,629 35 75 31.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
John Frawley — — — 1,834 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Dan Cassidy John Frawley
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
1984 12–8 60.0% #126 1,629 0 1 — — — — — — —
1985 7–19 26.9% #219 1,509 0 1 — — — — — — —
1986 2–6 25.0% #274 1,511 0 1 — — — — — — —
1987 4–3 57.1% #106 1,565 0 1 — — — — — — —
1988 7–21 25.0% #227 1,515 0 1 — — — — — — —
1989 3–10 23.1% #140 1,456 0 1 — — — — — — —
1990 0–7 0.0% #381 1,401 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Dan Cassidy John Frawley
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1984 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1985 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
1986 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
1987 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
1988 7 13 20 35.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1988 24 17 41 58.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
1989 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 1 10 11 9.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
1990 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 23 41 64 35.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 11 12 8.3% Career 37 40 77 48.1% 13 14 27 48.1% 12 19 31 38.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Dan Cassidy John Frawley
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1969 1486 102.3 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.00 — — — -0.08 1982 1498 117.6 — — — — +69 — -4 29.4% -1.82 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.57
1984 1630 119.1 — — — — -17 — +2 58.3% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 9–5 (64%) 102.3 +1.87 1983 1458 107.7 — — — — +83 — -2 34.8% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — +0.76
1985 1510 112.1 — — — — +51 -19 +47 31.4% -1.29 4–4 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 98.5 +0.61 1984 1654 130.9 — — — — -37 -1 -122 55.6% +0.50 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 +2.33
1986 1512 118.0 — — — — +6 +35 — 30.0% -1.20 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.59 1985 1647 127.7 — — — — -70 +1 -45 46.1% -0.25 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 98.1 +0.15
1987 1565 111.6 — — — — -9 -18 — 47.1% -0.23 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.25 1987 1702 119.0 — — — — -91 — -89 52.4% +0.24 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.65
1988 1515 119.8 — — — — +22 -24 — 29.2% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) 94.0 -0.50 1988 1738 138.5 — — — — -14 — — 51.3% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 9–10 (47%) 100.0 -0.66
1989 1457 105.2 — — — — +10 — — 37.8% -1.13 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 92.7 +0.90 1989 1536 106.2 — — — — -2 +103 — 28.6% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.5 +0.38
1990 1402 99.8 — — — — +26 — — 12.5% -2.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1630 118.6 — — — — +19 -6 +20 36.1% -1.01 12–20 (38%) 19–26 (42%) 94.0 +2.31 Career 1835 132.6 — — — — -21 +22 -66 46.5% -0.24 17–25 (40%) 27–27 (50%) 95.8 +1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.