H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Dan Cassidy vs Raymond Moore H2H: 0-1
Raymond Moore holds a 1–0 lead over Dan Cassidy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raymond Moore leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Raymond Moore won the 1969 Auckland third round 6-4 6-4 6-8 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1969* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Raymond Moore | 6-4 6-4 6-8 8-6 | Dan Cassidy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dan Cassidy | #753 | #74 | 187 | 1,629 | 35 | 75 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Raymond Moore | #503 | #32 | 0 | 1,892 | 357 | 376 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dan Cassidy | Raymond Moore | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 8 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 35–23 | 60.3% | — | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 32–39 | 45.1% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 17–28 | 37.8% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 36–36 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,402 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #39 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 35–30 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #138 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #99 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #112 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #100 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |