H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Dan Cassidy vs Victor Pecci H2H: 0-1

Victor Pecci holds a 1–0 lead over Dan Cassidy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Victor Pecci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Victor Pecci won the 1987 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships round of 64 7-6 6-1.

USA Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
PAR Age 70 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Victor Pecci #270 7-6 6-1 Dan Cassidy #216 Match data Jul 8, 1987* R64 U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dan Cassidy #753 #74 187 1,629 35 75 31.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Victor Pecci #666 #9 0 2,085 354 244 59.2% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Dan Cassidy Victor Pecci
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1969 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,481 0 0
1984 12–8 60.0% #126 1,629 0 1 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,468 0 0
1985 7–19 26.9% #219 1,509 0 1 1974 2–4 33.3% #318 1,480 0 0
1986 2–6 25.0% #274 1,511 0 1 1975 21–21 50.0% #55 1,702 0 0
1987 4–3 57.1% #106 1,565 0 1 1976 46–29 61.3% #34 1,804 0 2
1988 7–21 25.0% #227 1,515 0 1 1977 38–26 59.4% #38 1,781 0 2
1989 3–10 23.1% #140 1,456 0 1 1978 30–24 55.6% #46 1,859 0 3
1990 0–7 0.0% #381 1,401 0 1 1979 56–19 74.7% #11 1,994 0 6
1980 37–20 64.9% #29 1,840 0 7
1981 48–20 70.6% #16 1,822 0 9
1982 19–19 50.0% #68 1,705 0 9
1983 18–15 54.5% #56 1,721 0 10
1984 17–12 58.6% #38 1,780 0 10
1985 12–19 38.7% #110 1,610 0 10
1986 4–6 40.0% #140 1,578 0 10
1987 6–8 42.9% #256 1,546 0 10

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Dan Cassidy Victor Pecci
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1969 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
1984 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
1985 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1974 2 4 6 33.3%
1986 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1975 3 2 5 60.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1987 3 1 4 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 10 5 15 66.7% 27 16 43 62.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
1988 7 13 20 35.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 0 3 3 0.0% 38 21 59 64.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
1989 2 8 10 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 23 13 36 63.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1990 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1979 8 3 11 72.7% 39 10 49 79.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 4 6 33.3%
1980 1 1 2 50.0% 26 13 39 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
1981 3 2 5 60.0% 43 16 59 72.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
1982 3 3 6 50.0% 15 14 29 51.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
1983 4 3 7 57.1% 14 12 26 53.8%
1984 2 1 3 66.7% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
1985 2 5 7 28.6% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1986 4 6 10 40.0%
1987 3 1 4 75.0% 3 7 10 30.0%
Career 23 41 64 35.9% 4 13 17 23.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 11 12 8.3% Career 41 33 74 55.4% 274 172 446 61.4% 21 15 36 58.3% 18 24 42 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Dan Cassidy Victor Pecci
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1969 1486 102.3 25.0% -1.00 -0.08 1972 1482 98.7 0.0% -3.00 +0.10
1984 1630 119.1 -17 +2 58.3% +0.25 3–3 (50%) 9–5 (64%) +1.87 1973 1469 97.7 0.0% -3.50 +0.15
1985 1510 112.1 +51 -19 +47 31.4% -1.29 4–4 (50%) 4–8 (33%) +0.61 1974 1481 115.3 +28 30.8% -0.46 1–0 0–1 +0.27
1986 1512 118.0 +6 +35 30.0% -1.20 2–2 (50%) 0–1 -0.59 1975 1702 141.5 -68 -44 50.5% -0.01 6–6 (50%) 7–6 (54%) -1.49
1987 1565 111.6 -9 -18 47.1% -0.23 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) +0.25 1976 1805 139.8 -50 -14 59.8% +0.66 13–12 (52%) 15–14 (52%) +3.03
1988 1515 119.8 +22 -24 29.2% -1.37 0–3 (0%) 1–5 (17%) -0.50 1977 1782 139.3 -145 +38 56.6% +0.31 16–12 (57%) 12–10 (55%) +5.37
1989 1457 105.2 +10 37.8% -1.13 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) +0.90 1978 1859 154.6 -233 +61 -248 56.3% +0.61 8–14 (36%) 3–4 (43%) -1.68
1990 1402 99.8 +26 12.5% -2.44 0–2 0–3 (0%) +0.08 1979 1995 161.2 -286 +142 -233 68.3% +1.12 14–5 (74%) 12–11 (52%) -2.65
1980 1840 140.1 -135 +87 -1 59.7% +0.71 11–5 (69%) 9–7 (56%) +1.02
1981 1822 154.3 -117 +93 64.4% +0.90 15–6 (71%) 8–8 (50%) -1.04
1982 1705 137.3 +2 +108 +7 50.0% +0.10 8–8 (50%) 10–5 (67%) -1.68
1983 1721 141.2 -4 +30 56.0% +0.28 4–5 (44%) 8–2 (80%) +0.86
1984 1781 136.2 -63 +21 53.5% +0.11 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) +0.01
1985 1610 138.7 +36 +76 37.3% -0.55 6–3 (67%) 3–0 (100%) -1.77
1986 1579 116.2 +60 44.0% -0.28 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.63
1987 1546 112.6 +114 +26 46.4% +0.21 1–1 1–4 (20%) +1.72
Career 1630 118.6 +19 -6 +20 36.1% -1.01 12–20 (38%) 19–26 (42%) 94.0 +2.31 Career 2086 150.5 -101 +57 -119 56.8% +0.47 112–83 (57%) 94–77 (55%) 103.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.