H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Danai Udomchoke vs George Bastl H2H: 1-0

Danai Udomchoke holds a 1–0 lead over George Bastl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danai Udomchoke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danai Udomchoke won the 2006 Bangkok round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Danai Udomchoke
THA Age 45 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
George Bastl
SUI Age 51 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danai Udomchoke #113 6-3 6-0 George Bastl #152 Match data Sep 28, 2006* R32 Bangkok ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danai Udomchoke #1,207 #77 646 1,631 18 52 25.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
George Bastl #953 #71 569 1,656 47 85 35.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danai Udomchoke George Bastl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2001 2–1 66.7% #283 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 0–1 0.0% #211 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2003 0–1 0.0% #162 1,437 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
22 2004 0–3 0.0% #204 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2005 2–4 33.3% #121 1,562 0 0 1998 1–3 25.0% #194 1,501 0 0
24 2006 6–12 33.3% #104 1,563 0 0 1999 6–7 46.2% #81 1,558 0 0
25 2007 7–19 26.9% #154 1,498 0 0 2000 15–22 40.5% #105 1,611 0 0
26 2008 0–2 0.0% #152 1,525 0 0 2001 10–15 40.0% #115 1,622 0 0
27 2009 0–5 0.0% #162 1,501 0 0 2002 3–9 25.0% #160 1,564 0 0
28 2010 0–1 0.0% #457 1,480 0 0 2003 0–3 0.0% #277 1,499 0 0
29 2011 1–1 50.0% #210 1,507 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #201 1,490 0 0
30 2012 0–2 0.0% #149 1,523 0 0 2005 4–7 36.4% #128 1,564 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2006 5–8 38.5% #173 1,588 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2007 1–4 20.0% #464 1,522 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2008 1–4 20.0% #233 1,619 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #523 1,473 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danai Udomchoke George Bastl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2001 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2004 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2006 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2007 4 11 15 26.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2000 11 13 24 45.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2009 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2011 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 13 37 50 26.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 11 16 31.2% — — — — — 37 51 88 42.0% 2 12 14 14.3% 3 13 16 18.8% 5 9 14 35.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 69/69 of Danai Udomchoke's and 122/132 of George Bastl's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Danai Udomchoke George Bastl
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2001 3/3 3.3 2.3 60.2% 71.8% 45.1% 57.4% 41.1% 61.0% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1/1 2.0 2.0 56.6% 50.0% 39.1% 58.3% 50.0% 45.3% 34.0% 1996 1/1 4.0 2.0 65.0% 67.3% 53.6% 50.0% 33.3% 62.5% 26.9%
22 2004 3/3 1.3 3.7 62.5% 59.7% 47.9% 49.9% 31.5% 54.9% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 6/6 2.7 4.3 58.4% 65.1% 50.3% 58.0% 48.6% 58.3% 36.2% 1998 3/4 4.0 3.3 72.6% 63.1% 43.7% 47.1% 30.0% 57.6% 33.1%
24 2006 18/18 4.3 3.5 63.0% 69.5% 42.7% 62.0% 29.5% 60.0% 35.9% 1999 11/13 5.1 3.2 63.5% 68.4% 48.1% 57.2% 41.1% 61.1% 37.7%
25 2007 26/26 3.3 3.8 59.9% 67.8% 47.9% 49.2% 39.3% 59.6% 35.4% 2000 32/37 3.8 2.8 66.2% 63.9% 48.5% 58.5% 37.4% 58.6% 39.3%
26 2008 2/2 5.5 7.0 66.4% 56.0% 37.9% 49.4% 45.0% 49.9% 34.3% 2001 23/25 6.3 1.9 69.0% 64.5% 49.6% 50.3% 44.1% 60.2% 38.5%
27 2009 5/5 3.4 3.0 61.2% 67.1% 42.4% 62.1% 40.0% 57.5% 30.2% 2002 12/12 5.8 5.0 62.9% 67.2% 44.2% 58.8% 27.8% 58.5% 32.7%
28 2010 1/1 0.0 2.0 65.4% 64.7% 38.9% 57.1% 0.0% 55.8% 27.5% 2003 3/3 1.0 1.7 67.6% 64.9% 46.2% 47.8% 33.3% 59.0% 26.5%
29 2011 2/2 2.0 3.0 64.4% 64.0% 45.6% 52.3% 56.3% 57.7% 40.5% 2004 1/1 8.0 2.0 69.4% 71.2% 42.3% 71.4% 50.0% 62.4% 31.9%
30 2012 2/2 4.5 3.5 63.3% 60.0% 44.8% 43.4% 47.7% 54.5% 33.5% 2005 11/11 5.9 3.0 59.7% 62.9% 47.8% 59.8% 46.0% 58.4% 36.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 13/13 6.9 3.5 57.3% 71.7% 44.5% 56.0% 30.4% 60.1% 34.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 6.0 3.0 65.7% 71.4% 40.6% 51.0% 15.5% 60.7% 33.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 5.8 2.6 63.6% 65.8% 50.9% 58.0% 31.2% 60.6% 29.0%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 5.5 4.5 52.3% 69.4% 41.4% 31.0% 49.1% 56.0% 42.4%
Career — 69/70 3.4 3.6 61.2% 66.8% 45.5% 54.8% 37.8% 58.5% 35.3% — 122/132 5.3 3.0 64.5% 66.1% 47.2% 55.4% 36.9% 59.4% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danai Udomchoke George Bastl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2000 1511 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1509 104.7 -0.29 -0.14 0.936 49.8% +18 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1489 101.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2003 1438 91.4 +0.50 -1.38 0.622 40.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.10 1996 1495 106.7 -1.02 +6.41 0.716 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
22 2004 1489 108.9 -1.95 -0.64 0.840 46.7% +25 — — 12.5% -1.63 0–1 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2005 1563 118.8 -1.66 -0.22 0.869 47.6% -47 — — 36.8% -0.89 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.36 1998 1502 110.8 -1.46 +0.40 0.781 46.0% — — — 30.0% -0.90 1–1 1–0 — -0.32
24 2006 1564 116.2 -2.69 -0.23 0.899 48.1% +6 — +5 31.7% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.02 1999 1559 129.2 -0.33 +1.04 0.969 49.6% +50 — — 50.0% -0.03 0–2 3–2 (60%) — +0.94
25 2007 1499 113.6 -3.16 -1.20 0.876 47.4% +15 -71 +50 37.5% -0.94 2–8 (20%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.93 2000 1611 132.3 -2.50 +1.37 0.949 49.0% +51 -110 -122 40.7% -0.52 6–4 (60%) 3–9 (25%) — -0.59
26 2008 1525 106.5 -3.90 -1.95 0.684 42.5% — — — 33.3% -2.67 0–2 1–0 — +0.02 2001 1622 126.7 -1.08 +0.30 0.967 49.3% +92 -173 — 41.7% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 8–6 (57%) — -0.23
27 2009 1501 108.8 -2.60 -1.67 0.711 44.3% +41 — — 0.0% -2.64 — 0–2 — +0.11 2002 1564 112.2 -2.22 -2.35 0.786 45.8% +54 — -26 31.3% -1.19 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.20
28 2010 1480 100.3 -0.48 +0.05 0.621 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02 2003 1500 93.7 -3.02 +0.52 0.647 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — +0.05
29 2011 1508 106.0 -0.56 -1.62 0.959 49.1% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.21 2004 1491 102.5 -1.47 +0.15 0.847 48.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
30 2012 1523 106.3 +0.44 -2.27 0.738 45.0% — — — 28.6% -1.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.04 2005 1564 113.3 -2.00 -0.81 0.880 47.3% +41 — — 37.0% -0.96 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.35
31 2013 1519 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1589 118.6 -2.70 -0.72 0.853 47.5% +30 — -49 35.7% -0.89 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.07
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1523 107.1 -2.47 -1.23 0.863 47.0% +43 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.26
33 2015 1501 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1619 114.2 -0.33 -1.38 0.737 45.5% +36 — — 25.0% -1.42 1–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1473 105.8 -1.01 +0.84 0.965 48.7% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 — — -0.06
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1426 93.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1402 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1386 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1375 96.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1631 112.5 -2.44 -0.87 0.852 47.1% +9 -71 +31 32.2% -1.18 8–16 (33%) 12–13 (48%) 96.6 +1.40 — 1656 119.8 -1.84 +0.11 0.895 48.0% +55 -135 -62 37.8% -0.72 16–22 (42%) 22–31 (42%) 95.6 +0.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.