H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Danai Udomchoke vs Noam Okun H2H: 1-0
Danai Udomchoke holds a 1–0 lead over Noam Okun in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danai Udomchoke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danai Udomchoke won the 2005 Beijing third round 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
THA
Age 44
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2005* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Danai Udomchoke | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | Noam Okun | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danai Udomchoke | #1,207 | #77 | 646 | 1,631 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noam Okun | #1,046 | #95 | 411 | 1,628 | 20 | 43 | 31.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danai Udomchoke | Noam Okun | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #283 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #532 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #128 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #141 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #194 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #178 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #210 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #431 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |