H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Danai Udomchoke vs Tomas Zib H2H: 1-0
Danai Udomchoke holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Zib in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danai Udomchoke leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Danai Udomchoke won the 2006 Queen's Club second round 3-6 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
THA
Age 44
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2006* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Danai Udomchoke | 3-6 7-5 6-0 | Tomas Zib | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danai Udomchoke | #1,207 | #77 | 646 | 1,631 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Zib | #1,339 | #51 | 688 | 1,636 | 41 | 94 | 30.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danai Udomchoke | Tomas Zib | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #283 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #111 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #117 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #224 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #145 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #121 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #210 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–27 | 40.0% | #59 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–20 | 16.7% | #133 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #138 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #416 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |