H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Dane Sweeny vs Taro Daniel H2H: 1-0
Dane Sweeny holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dane Sweeny leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dane Sweeny won the 2023 Shanghai Masters first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2023* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Dane Sweeny | 6-2 6-3 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2023 | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Dane Sweeny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dane Sweeny | #122 | #122 | 521 | 1,661 | 3 | 7 | 30.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dane Sweeny | Taro Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #496 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #256 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #345 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |