H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs Damir Keretic H2H: 1-1

Danie Visser and Damir Keretic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on clay, while Danie Visser leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1988 Forest Hills round of 64 4-6 6-2 6-2.

RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
GER Age 66 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Damir Keretic #130 4-6 6-2 6-2 Danie Visser #194 Match data May 4, 1988* R64 Forest Hills ATP 250 Clay
Danie Visser #182 7-6 6-4 6-7 6-3 Damir Keretic #109 Match data Jun 26, 1985* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Damir Keretic #837 #58 35 1,741 87 120 42.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser Damir Keretic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0 1979 1–2 33.3% #400 1,496 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0 1980 3–7 30.0% #239 1,477 0 0
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0 1981 3–6 33.3% 1,476 0 0
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0 1982 15–17 46.9% #69 1,618 0 0
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0 1983 7–17 29.2% #86 1,528 0 0
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0 1984 7–8 46.7% #143 1,574 0 0
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0 1985 12–15 44.4% #85 1,595 0 0
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0 1986 16–14 53.3% #68 1,687 0 0
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0 1987 13–15 46.4% #109 1,694 0 0
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0 1988 7–17 29.2% #207 1,537 0 0
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0 1989 3–2 60.0% #412 1,575 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser Damir Keretic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1982 12 15 27 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 1 6 7 14.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 9 21 30 30.0% 66 82 148 44.6% 7 11 18 38.9% 5 6 11 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser Damir Keretic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01 1979 1496 100.4 28.6% -1.86 1–0 1–1 +0.34
20 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20 1980 1477 97.2 +53 +20 33.3% -1.17 2–2 (50%) 1–1 +1.39
21 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59 1981 1477 122.8 +42 40.9% -0.18 1–3 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 +0.85
22 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82 1982 1618 125.5 +10 -32 46.0% -0.31 9–5 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 103.9 +2.82
23 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53 1983 1528 123.9 -63 +44 39.3% -0.79 2–8 (20%) 4–3 (57%) 96.0 +0.53
24 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55 1984 1574 127.4 +56 -12 43.8% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 2–0 +0.03
25 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15 1985 1596 124.5 +29 -45 44.6% -0.34 3–5 (38%) 3–6 (33%) 97.4 +1.43
26 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16 1986 1688 134.4 -143 +52 48.1% -0.22 8–1 (89%) 7–5 (58%) 111.3 -1.30
27 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79 1987 1694 139.5 -177 +69 -181 47.8% -0.07 2–3 (40%) 7–2 (78%) 103.2 -1.52
28 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54 1988 1538 120.7 -47 +102 35.4% -0.81 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 94.6 -0.37
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02 1989 1576 113.3 -37 52.9% +0.24 1–0 2–1 (67%) +0.44
Career 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 1741 133.5 -76 +45 -60 43.3% -0.44 34–35 (49%) 34–32 (52%) 105.0 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.