H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Danie Visser vs Dan Cassidy H2H: 1-1
Danie Visser and Dan Cassidy are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dan Cassidy leads 1–0 on grass, while Danie Visser leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1985 Montreal / Toronto second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 1985* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Danie Visser | 6-3 7-5 | Dan Cassidy | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1985* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Dan Cassidy | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dan Cassidy | #753 | #74 | 187 | 1,629 | 35 | 75 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danie Visser | Dan Cassidy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–21 | 25.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,457 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #381 | 1,402 | 0 | 1 |