H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Danie Visser vs Francesco Cancellotti H2H: 0-1
Francesco Cancellotti holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Francesco Cancellotti leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francesco Cancellotti won the 1989 Johannesburg third round 6-4 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 63
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 16, 1989* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Francesco Cancellotti | 6-4 6-7 6-4 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Francesco Cancellotti | #708 | #21 | 264 | 1,857 | 111 | 112 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danie Visser | Francesco Cancellotti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #69 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–12 | 67.6% | #26 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #242 | 1,575 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #74 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #107 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #114 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #258 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #280 | 1,529 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |