H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Danie Visser vs Hank Pfister H2H: 0-1
Hank Pfister holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hank Pfister leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1982 Newport quarterfinal 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1982* | Newport | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Hank Pfister | 6-2 7-5 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danie Visser | Hank Pfister | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |