H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs Jim Delaney H2H: 0-1

Jim Delaney holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Delaney leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jim Delaney won the 1982 Forest Hills Wct round of 64 7-6 6-3.

RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
USA Age 73 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jim Delaney 7-6 6-3 Danie Visser Match data May 4, 1982* R64 Forest Hills Wct ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jim Delaney #262 #64 0 1,678 78 131 37.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser Jim Delaney
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0 1972 1–5 16.7% 1,453 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0 1973 4–5 44.4% #159 1,535 0 0
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0 1974 9–7 56.2% #109 1,589 0 0
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0 1975 10–14 41.7% #73 1,647 0 0
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0 1976 20–29 40.8% #64 1,633 0 0
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0 1977 16–27 37.2% #74 1,624 0 0
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0 1978 0–2 0.0% #418 1,602 0 0
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0 1979 2–9 18.2% #276 1,521 0 0
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0 1980 2–5 28.6% #269 1,512 0 0
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0 1981 11–21 34.4% 1,514 0 0
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0 1982 3–7 30.0% 1,513 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser Jim Delaney
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1972 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 12 9 21 57.1% 4 12 16 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 4 8 12 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 8 14 42.9%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1979 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 2 7 9 22.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 23 39 62 37.1% 23 47 70 32.9% 16 20 36 44.4% 16 25 41 39.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser Jim Delaney
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01 1972 1453 97.8 +87 31.3% -1.13 0–2 3–1 (75%) +0.33
20 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20 1973 1535 115.9 +29 43.5% -0.04 1–1 1–3 (25%) -0.95
21 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59 1974 1590 115.9 +3 -44 -43 51.2% +0.15 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 103.1 +1.56
22 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82 1975 1648 130.0 -58 -15 40.7% -0.72 4–4 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 105.6 -1.20
23 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53 1976 1633 124.0 +10 -63 -67 40.3% -0.51 9–7 (56%) 5–11 (31%) 101.2 +2.59
24 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55 1977 1625 131.3 +11 -87 -49 41.1% -0.61 9–11 (45%) 3–5 (38%) 99.2 -0.92
25 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15 1978 1602 98.4 0.0% -4.50 -0.03
26 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16 1979 1521 100.2 +41 -40 +50 25.9% -1.41 1–3 (25%) 0–2 +0.72
27 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79 1980 1513 116.6 +44 35.3% -0.65 1–2 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 99.0 +0.36
28 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54 1981 1514 115.6 -18 -33 +92 42.4% -0.82 3–10 (23%) 10–4 (71%) 100.0 +1.04
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02 1982 1514 105.2 -10 31.8% -1.50 1–1 2–2 (50%) 0.00
Career 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 1678 125.3 +4 -38 +3 40.0% -0.67 33–44 (43%) 36–37 (49%) 102.3 +1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.