H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 0-1

Joakim Nystrom holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Joakim Nystrom leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1982 Roland Garros round of 64 6-7 7-6 6-2 6-2.

RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
SWE Age 63 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Joakim Nystrom #99 6-7 7-6 6-2 6-2 Danie Visser Match data May 28, 1982* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Joakim Nystrom #977 #7 54 2,121 257 136 65.4% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser Joakim Nystrom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1980 0–1 0.0% #440 1,492 0 0
18 1981 13–12 52.0% #69 1,645 0 0
19 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0 1982 9–14 39.1% #98 1,617 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0 1983 26–12 68.4% #27 1,867 0 1
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0 1984 56–20 73.7% #11 1,969 0 5
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0 1985 50–21 70.4% #11 1,943 0 7
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0 1986 55–17 76.4% #7 1,926 0 12
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0 1987 33–16 67.3% #16 1,879 0 13
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0 1988 13–15 46.4% #69 1,730 0 13
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0 1989 2–8 20.0% #331 1,607 0 13
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser Joakim Nystrom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 0 3 3 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 5 4 9 55.6% 12 7 19 63.2% 9 1 10 90.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 20 4 24 83.3% 30 10 40 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1985 14 6 20 70.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1986 15 3 18 83.3% 20 8 28 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 18 5 23 78.3%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 22 8 30 73.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 1 4 5 20.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 60 31 91 65.9% 138 70 208 66.3% 23 12 35 65.7% 36 23 59 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser Joakim Nystrom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1980 1492 101.1 0.0% -3.50 -0.05
18 1981 1645 133.9 -78 +23 -103 46.8% -0.24 5–1 (83%) 0–5 (0%) 104.2 -0.49
19 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01 1982 1618 133.1 -103 +115 43.5% -0.32 2–4 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.7 -0.22
20 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20 1983 1868 149.9 -235 -70 -111 63.6% +0.95 10–5 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 108.2 +0.17
21 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59 1984 1969 153.9 -39 -15 -234 65.1% +0.98 19–4 (83%) 15–8 (65%) 115.0 -0.15
22 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82 1985 1943 156.7 +8 +26 -150 65.8% +1.19 12–9 (57%) 12–5 (71%) 100.2 +0.33
23 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53 1986 1926 163.8 +108 +4 -113 70.2% +1.58 13–7 (65%) 11–5 (69%) 103.2 -0.15
24 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55 1987 1880 153.1 -25 +138 -78 62.8% +0.97 9–5 (64%) 9–5 (64%) 103.3 -0.40
25 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15 1988 1730 133.0 +3 +142 +66 47.5% +0.11 5–3 (63%) 3–6 (33%) 94.9 -1.25
26 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16 1989 1608 95.3 +49 +152 30.8% -1.92 1–3 (25%) +0.53
27 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02
Career 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 2121 156.2 +2 +44 -117 60.9% +0.82 76–41 (65%) 57–41 (58%) 108.6 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.