H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs John Frawley H2H: 1-0

Danie Visser holds a 1–0 lead over John Frawley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danie Visser leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1989 Australian Open round of 64 7-6 6-3 7-6.

RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser #146 7-6 6-3 7-6 John Frawley Match data Jan 20, 1989* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
John Frawley 1,834 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser John Frawley
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser John Frawley
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 4 5 9 44.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1988 24 17 41 58.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 1 10 11 9.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 37 40 77 48.1% 13 14 27 48.1% 12 19 31 38.7% 5 10 15 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser John Frawley
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1498 117.6 +69 -4 29.4% -1.82 1–2 (33%) 1–1 -0.57
17 1983 1458 107.7 +83 -2 34.8% -1.09 0–3 (0%) 2–0 +0.76
18 1984 1654 130.9 -37 -1 -122 55.6% +0.50 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 +2.33
19 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01 1985 1647 127.7 -70 +1 -45 46.1% -0.25 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 98.1 +0.15
20 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20
21 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59 1987 1702 119.0 -91 -89 52.4% +0.24 1–1 1–2 (33%) -0.65
22 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -151 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82 1988 1738 138.5 -14 51.3% +0.03 7–6 (54%) 9–10 (47%) 100.0 -0.66
23 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53 1989 1536 106.2 -2 +103 28.6% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.5 +0.38
24 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55
25 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15
26 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16
27 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02
Career 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 1835 132.6 -21 +22 -66 46.5% -0.24 17–25 (40%) 27–27 (50%) 95.8 +1.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.