H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Danie Visser vs John Sadri H2H: 0-2
John Sadri holds a 2–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, John Sadri leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Sadri won the 1985 Johannesburg fourth round 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1985* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | John Sadri | 7-6 7-6 | Danie Visser | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1982* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | John Sadri | 6-7 6-1 6-2 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| John Sadri | #997 | #14 | 0 | 1,976 | 214 | 189 | 53.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danie Visser | John Sadri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #84 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #45 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 47–25 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #38 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #130 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |