H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs Leif Shiras H2H: 1-2

Leif Shiras holds a 2–1 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Leif Shiras leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1987 Australian Open round of 128 4-6 6-2 6-3 7-6.

RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser #86 4-6 6-2 6-3 7-6 Leif Shiras #177 Match data Jan 14, 1987* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Leif Shiras #116 6-3 6-4 Danie Visser #129 Match data Dec 19, 1985* R32 Adelaide International ATP 250 Grass
Leif Shiras #59 7-5 6-4 Danie Visser #98 Match data Feb 28, 1985* R32 Houston ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Leif Shiras #1,118 #31 291 1,687 71 102 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser Leif Shiras
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0 1980 0–2 0.0% #482 1,475 0 0
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,454 0 0
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0 1983 2–2 50.0% #408 1,485 0 0
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0 1984 15–16 48.4% #61 1,555 0 0
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0 1985 17–19 47.2% #123 1,646 0 0
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0 1986 2–5 28.6% #176 1,591 0 0
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0 1987 4–11 26.7% #157 1,524 0 0
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0 1988 9–12 42.9% #110 1,586 0 0
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0 1989 14–16 46.7% #85 1,637 0 0
30 1990 8–18 30.8% #181 1,553 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser Leif Shiras
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1982 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 3 5 8 37.5% 8 8 16 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1990 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
Career 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 22 48 70 31.4% 3 8 11 27.3% 27 27 54 50.0% 19 19 38 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser Leif Shiras
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01
20 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) +1.20 1980 1475 97.2 0.0% -4.60 -0.03
21 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) +1.59
22 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) -0.82 1982 1455 96.8 0.0% -3.33 +0.19
23 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) +0.53 1983 1485 108.0 +87 45.5% -0.45 1–0 2–1 (67%) +0.08
24 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) +0.55 1984 1556 124.7 -88 +124 48.1% -0.20 6–5 (55%) 10–10 (50%) +0.82
25 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) -1.15 1985 1646 126.8 -74 +37 48.4% -0.40 7–8 (47%) 11–8 (58%) +0.46
26 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) +1.16 1986 1592 109.4 -37 42.1% -0.37 1–4 (20%) 3–2 (60%) +0.95
27 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) -0.79 1987 1525 112.0 -4 -15 +97 35.0% -1.00 0–2 3–4 (43%) +0.97
28 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) -0.54 1988 1587 128.4 +10 45.3% -0.21 3–5 (38%) 1–3 (25%) -0.08
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02 1989 1638 124.3 -38 +26 45.8% -0.18 8–5 (62%) 6–5 (55%) +0.78
30 1990 1553 112.8 +19 -37 +91 28.3% -1.65 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) +0.18
Career 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 1687 126.2 -30 -23 +79 42.4% -0.59 29–30 (49%) 38–37 (51%) 104.6 +2.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.