H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs Mario Martinez H2H: 0-1

Mario Martinez holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mario Martinez leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mario Martinez won the 1982 Ancona round of 16 4-6 6-4 7-6.

RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
BOL Age 64 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mario Martinez 4-6 6-4 7-6 Danie Visser Match data Nov 19, 1982* R16 Ancona ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mario Martinez 1,815 0 0 0 0 3 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser Mario Martinez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser Mario Martinez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 19 7 26 73.1%
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 17 13 30 56.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1984 3 6 9 33.3%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 3 9 12 25.0% 75 55 130 57.7% 3 4 7 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser Mario Martinez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1980 1690 131.4 +40 63.1% +0.78 5–3 (63%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 +3.37
19 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01 1981 1759 140.8 -243 +58 51.9% +0.23 10–5 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.6 +0.16
20 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20 1982 1799 140.5 -230 +37 52.9% +0.12 9–6 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.1 -0.90
21 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59 1983 1659 129.4 -148 +88 44.9% -0.40 5–4 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 100.1 +0.32
22 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82 1984 1632 115.7 +63 40.0% -0.90 1–1 0–1 -0.30
23 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53 1985 1623 102.9 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.14
24 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55
25 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15
26 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16
27 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02
Career 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 1815 140.0 -215 +56 51.7% +0.08 30–19 (61%) 19–16 (54%) 104.3 +1.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.