H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs Marty Davis H2H: 1-1

Danie Visser and Marty Davis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marty Davis won the 1989 Stratton Mountain round of 64 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Marty Davis
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marty Davis #121 7-6 6-2 Danie Visser #102 Match data Aug 2, 1989* R64 Stratton Mountain ATP 250 Hard
Danie Visser #161 7-6 6-3 Marty Davis #55 Match data Aug 21, 1985* R64 Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marty Davis #811 #47 158 1,797 151 173 46.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser Marty Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% #301 1,483 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0 1981 14–18 43.8% — 1,605 0 0
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0 1982 16–22 42.1% #99 1,581 0 0
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0 1983 10–11 47.6% #84 1,611 0 0
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0 1984 25–19 56.8% #64 1,733 0 1
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0 1985 20–19 51.3% #63 1,710 0 3
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0 1986 21–25 45.7% #89 1,627 0 3
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0 1987 16–17 48.5% #96 1,652 0 3
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0 1988 20–25 44.4% #95 1,652 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1989 9–14 39.1% #143 1,618 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 1990 0–2 0.0% #507 1,590 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser Marty Davis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1981 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 7 9 16 43.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 13 9 22 59.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1985 3 8 11 27.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 6 16 62.5%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1986 10 11 21 47.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 13 10 23 56.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 13 15 28 46.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% — 77 85 162 47.5% 17 26 43 39.5% 28 27 55 50.9% 29 35 64 45.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser Marty Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01 1978 1484 98.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.21
20 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82 1981 1606 128.1 — — — — +35 -73 -29 45.5% -0.23 5–9 (36%) 8–8 (50%) 99.4 +1.65
23 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53 1982 1582 128.9 — — — — +41 -67 -7 44.9% -0.02 2–8 (20%) 3–12 (20%) 88.7 +2.20
24 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55 1983 1612 119.4 — — — — -14 — +24 47.1% -0.06 3–3 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 101.6 +1.74
25 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15 1984 1733 133.2 — — — — -28 -224 +11 52.7% +0.28 9–5 (64%) 9–11 (45%) 104.6 +2.05
26 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16 1985 1711 137.6 — — — — +1 -217 +64 51.6% +0.25 5–7 (42%) 5–13 (28%) 94.2 +0.65
27 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79 1986 1628 131.4 — — — — +20 -86 +76 48.7% +0.07 8–12 (40%) 13–12 (52%) 98.4 +0.70
28 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54 1987 1653 132.7 — — — — +29 -104 +23 49.4% -0.02 4–6 (40%) 11–11 (50%) 98.8 +0.33
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 1988 1653 130.5 — — — — +16 -106 -2 46.3% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) 96.0 -0.96
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1619 125.3 — — — — +40 — — 43.8% -0.33 3–4 (43%) 4–7 (36%) 97.4 -0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1591 103.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 1–1 — -0.03
Career — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 — 1798 136.0 — — — — +15 -116 +17 47.8% -0.03 46–66 (41%) 69–88 (44%) 92.6 +2.51

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.