H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs Mike De Palmer H2H: 0-2

Mike De Palmer holds a 2–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mike De Palmer leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mike De Palmer won the 1985 Tel Aviv round of 32 6-2 7-6.

RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 2
2 main-draw meetings
USA Left-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mike De Palmer 6-2 7-6 Danie Visser #140 Match data Oct 17, 1985* R32 Tel Aviv ATP 250 Hard
Mike De Palmer 2-6 7-6 7-6 Danie Visser Match data Oct 21, 1982* R32 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mike De Palmer 1,752 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser Mike De Palmer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,620 0 0
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser Mike De Palmer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1984 10 6 16 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 6 10 16 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 34 39 73 46.6% 10 12 22 45.5% 12 15 27 44.4% 12 11 23 52.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser Mike De Palmer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01 1981 1497 107.5 0.0% -3.00 -0.19
20 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20 1982 1622 119.9 +40 -44 54.1% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 10–3 (77%) 111.2 +2.64
21 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59 1983 1582 134.9 +90 -20 -9 49.5% -0.08 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 99.6 +0.81
22 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82 1984 1636 127.4 +76 54.2% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 103.7 +1.07
23 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53 1985 1714 138.4 -69 -101 -3 50.0% -0.08 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) 99.8 -1.39
24 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55 1986 1674 121.3 -14 -49 40.8% -0.75 3–2 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 102.2 -0.63
25 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15 1987 1589 116.5 -4 35.1% -0.97 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.4 -0.70
26 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16
27 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02
Career 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 1752 135.1 +28 -50 -18 48.1% -0.26 26–29 (47%) 37–25 (60%) 108.0 +1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.