H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Danie Visser vs Nick Saviano H2H: 0-1
Nick Saviano holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nick Saviano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nick Saviano won the 1983 Nancy semifinal 3-6 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 70
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1983* | Nancy | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Nick Saviano | 3-6 6-0 6-3 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nick Saviano | #736 | #48 | 0 | 1,789 | 158 | 199 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danie Visser | Nick Saviano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #179 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #115 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #62 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 32–32 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #72 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #93 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #97 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–27 | 34.1% | #99 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |