H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Danie Visser vs Paul Mcnamee H2H: 0-1
Paul Mcnamee holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Mcnamee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Mcnamee won the 1984 Cincinnati second round 3-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 71
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 1984* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Paul Mcnamee | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Mcnamee | #524 | #24 | 0 | 1,898 | 231 | 219 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danie Visser | Paul Mcnamee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #174 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #120 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #48 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #61 | 1,725 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #456 | 1,645 | 0 | 2 |