H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs Ramesh Krishnan H2H: 1-1

Danie Visser and Ramesh Krishnan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ramesh Krishnan won the 1986 Stratton Mountain round of 64 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Ramesh Krishnan
IND Age 65 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ramesh Krishnan 6-3 6-4 Danie Visser #105 Match data Aug 6, 1986* R64 Stratton Mountain ATP 250 Hard
Danie Visser #73 3-6 6-4 7-6 Ramesh Krishnan Match data Aug 16, 1984* R32 Columbus ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ramesh Krishnan — — — 1,892 278 249 52.8% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser Ramesh Krishnan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1978 6–5 54.5% — 1,537 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1979 7–12 36.8% — 1,584 0 0
19 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0 1980 14–11 56.0% — 1,713 0 0
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0 1981 13–16 44.8% — 1,755 0 1
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0 1982 22–23 48.9% — 1,741 0 2
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0 1983 20–21 48.8% — 1,749 0 2
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0 1984 31–19 62.0% — 1,842 0 3
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0 1985 23–21 52.3% — 1,805 0 3
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0 1986 29–22 56.9% — 1,845 0 5
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0 1987 29–22 56.9% — 1,790 0 5
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0 1988 28–15 65.1% — 1,757 0 6
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0 1989 21–17 55.3% — 1,717 0 7
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0 1990 20–21 48.8% — 1,698 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 1991 9–16 36.0% — 1,583 0 8
31 — — — — — — — 1992 4–5 44.4% — 1,616 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1993 2–2 50.0% — 1,639 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser Ramesh Krishnan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 3 1 4 75.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 5 4 9 55.6% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 7 7 14 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1983 7 8 15 46.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 15 7 22 68.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 4 13 69.2%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 7 14 50.0%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 17 8 25 68.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1988 21 11 32 65.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 20 14 34 58.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 15 12 27 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — 1 0 1 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% — 157 119 276 56.9% 33 53 86 38.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 46 44 90 51.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser Ramesh Krishnan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1486 97.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1537 115.0 — — — — +60 +16 — 54.5% +0.18 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.02
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1584 128.8 — — — — +55 -24 — 39.6% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.61
19 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01 1980 1713 127.2 — — — — -22 -93 -153 50.8% -0.03 6–2 (75%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.73
20 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.20 1981 1755 140.6 — — — — +40 -135 — 45.1% -0.38 4–7 (36%) 4–8 (33%) — +0.22
21 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.59 1982 1742 139.3 — — — — +1 -23 -190 47.3% -0.16 9–3 (75%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.02
22 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.82 1983 1749 145.4 — — — — +29 -115 -80 49.0% +0.04 6–8 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.76
23 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.53 1984 1843 148.4 — — — — +35 -224 -106 58.9% +0.72 11–6 (65%) 7–15 (32%) — -0.71
24 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55 1985 1806 149.5 — — — — -2 — +12 50.5% +0.04 10–6 (63%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.37
25 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.15 1986 1846 139.6 — — — — +4 -288 +69 58.3% +0.70 7–10 (41%) 4–8 (33%) — +1.08
26 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.16 1987 1790 139.1 — — — — +43 — +30 56.5% +0.43 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.98
27 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.79 1988 1758 134.4 — — — — +24 — +34 60.2% +0.74 9–7 (56%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.37
28 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.54 1989 1717 136.6 — — — — +43 — — 54.4% +0.36 4–6 (40%) 8–4 (67%) — +0.03
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 1990 1699 138.1 — — — — +21 — +16 50.0% +0.07 8–10 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -1.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1583 123.4 — — — — -2 — — 41.0% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.16
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1616 131.3 — — — — +7 — — 40.9% -0.23 2–0 1–0 — -0.81
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1640 118.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.13 0–2 — — -0.39
Career — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 — 1893 146.4 — — — — +22 -91 -23 52.1% +0.18 89–85 (51%) 69–75 (48%) 97.4 -0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.