Danie Visser
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 1, 1989 | H2H |
| Johan Kriek | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Jimmy Arias | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 7, 1990 | H2H |
| Paul Annacone | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Christo Van Rensburg | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 14, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC
Danie Visser vs Robert Vant Hof H2H: 1-0
Danie Visser holds a 1–0 lead over Robert Vant Hof in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danie Visser leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1989 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-3 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danie Visser | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | Robert Vant Hof | Match data | Aug 16, 1989* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Robert Vant Hof | — | — | — | 1,879 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Danie Visser | Robert Vant Hof | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Danie Visser | Robert Vant Hof | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1982 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1979 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1983 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
| 1984 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 1985 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1982 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 1986 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1983 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1987 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1984 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 1988 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1985 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1988 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1991 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 51 | 67 | 118 | 43.2% | 4 | 15 | 19 | 21.1% | 31 | 36 | 67 | 46.3% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | Career | 42 | 43 | 85 | 49.4% | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 15 | 25 | 40 | 37.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Danie Visser | Robert Vant Hof | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1981 | 1507 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.63 | 0–2 | 2–0 | — | +0.01 | 1978 | 1492 | 112.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.05 |
| 1982 | 1483 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -13 | +61 | 39.7% | -0.84 | 1–9 (10%) | 9–7 (56%) | 95.2 | +1.20 | 1979 | 1507 | 114.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 36.4% | -1.09 | 0–1 | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.60 |
| 1983 | 1496 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -38 | — | 42.3% | -0.17 | 3–5 (38%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.5 | +1.59 | 1980 | 1593 | 123.7 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -34 | -56 | 46.0% | -0.57 | 3–3 (50%) | 8–4 (67%) | 104.7 | +1.15 |
| 1984 | 1618 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -27 | -150 | +4 | 50.0% | -0.04 | 7–7 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | 101.4 | -0.82 | 1981 | 1667 | 131.2 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -127 | -104 | 43.0% | -0.43 | 5–5 (50%) | 2–6 (25%) | 97.9 | -0.32 |
| 1985 | 1643 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | -82 | — | +8 | 42.9% | -0.37 | 4–6 (40%) | 7–11 (39%) | 97.0 | +0.53 | 1982 | 1691 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -146 | — | 54.2% | +0.33 | 6–2 (75%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.0 | +3.05 |
| 1986 | 1676 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | -64 | — | +38 | 51.4% | -0.11 | 4–5 (44%) | 6–7 (46%) | 101.0 | +0.55 | 1983 | 1722 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -34 | — | -63 | 48.6% | -0.15 | 8–3 (73%) | 8–6 (57%) | 107.1 | -1.98 |
| 1987 | 1635 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | -10 | — | +22 | 43.4% | -0.35 | 3–4 (43%) | 10–7 (59%) | 102.4 | -1.15 | 1984 | 1580 | 107.4 | — | — | — | — | -11 | — | +27 | 34.0% | -0.87 | 3–4 (43%) | 2–4 (33%) | 95.4 | +0.46 |
| 1988 | 1591 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | +38 | 41.4% | -0.38 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–6 (33%) | 99.9 | +1.16 | 1985 | 1520 | 97.1 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.29 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.84 |
| 1989 | 1621 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -23 | — | +15 | 44.4% | -0.11 | 4–4 (50%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.8 | -0.79 | 1987 | 1498 | 104.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28.6% | -1.86 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.12 |
| 1990 | 1652 | 113.0 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | -22 | 51.9% | -0.11 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.2 | -0.54 | 1988 | 1524 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | — | 35.7% | -0.71 | 1–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.53 |
| 1991 | 1643 | 108.2 | -0.83 | -4.21 | 0.649 | 43.6% | -23 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.25 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.02 | 1989 | 1555 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | -5 | 48.1% | -0.37 | 2–5 (29%) | 5–1 (83%) | 99.0 | +0.26 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1536 | 95.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.20 |
| Career | 1710 | 127.9 | -0.83 | -4.21 | 0.649 | 43.6% | -19 | -50 | +21 | 44.9% | -0.31 | 33–48 (41%) | 58–58 (50%) | 100.6 | +0.80 | Career | 1880 | 131.6 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -86 | -41 | 44.1% | -0.42 | 29–29 (50%) | 38–34 (53%) | 102.6 | +1.43 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Robert Vant Hof
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yannick Noah | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jun 13, 1984 | — |
| Paul Mcnamee | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 28, 1982 | — |
| Brad Drewett | 2 | 1 | 3 | Apr 16, 1989 | — |
| Brad Gilbert | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 15, 1988 | — |
| Russell Simpson | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 9, 1984 | — |