Danie Visser
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 1, 1989 | H2H |
| Johan Kriek | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Jimmy Arias | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 7, 1990 | H2H |
| Paul Annacone | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Christo Van Rensburg | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 14, 1989 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC
Tim Gullikson holds a 2–1 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tim Gullikson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Gullikson won the 1984 South African Open round of 32 7-6 1-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tim Gullikson | 7-6 1-6 7-6 | Danie Visser | Match data | Nov 22, 1984* | R32 | South African Open | ATP 250 | Hard |
| Danie Visser | 6-7 2-6 7-5 6-4 6-2 | Tim Gullikson | Match data | Aug 30, 1984* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Tim Gullikson | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | Danie Visser | Match data | Jun 9, 1982* | R64 | Queen's Club Championships | ATP 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tim Gullikson | — | — | — | 2,012 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danie Visser | Tim Gullikson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Danie Visser | Tim Gullikson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1975 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1986 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1976 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1987 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1977 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 18 | 3 | 21 | 85.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 26 | 1988 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1978 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% |
| 27 | 1989 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% |
| 28 | 1990 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1980 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% |
| 29 | 1991 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1981 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 51 | 67 | 118 | 43.2% | 4 | 15 | 19 | 21.1% | 31 | 36 | 67 | 46.3% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | — | 95 | 70 | 165 | 57.6% | 29 | 32 | 61 | 47.5% | 54 | 33 | 87 | 62.1% | 64 | 62 | 126 | 50.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Danie Visser | Tim Gullikson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1981 | 1507 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | +43 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.63 | 0–2 | 2–0 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1982 | 1483 | 114.0 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -13 | +61 | 39.7% | -0.84 | 1–9 (10%) | 9–7 (56%) | 95.2 | +1.20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1983 | 1496 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +39 | -38 | — | 42.3% | -0.17 | 3–5 (38%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.5 | +1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1984 | 1618 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | -27 | -150 | +4 | 50.0% | -0.04 | 7–7 (50%) | 5–8 (38%) | 101.4 | -0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1985 | 1643 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | -82 | — | +8 | 42.9% | -0.37 | 4–6 (40%) | 7–11 (39%) | 97.0 | +0.53 | 1975 | 1526 | 110.0 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.38 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–0 | — | -0.56 |
| 24 | 1986 | 1676 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | -64 | — | +38 | 51.4% | -0.11 | 4–5 (44%) | 6–7 (46%) | 101.0 | +0.55 | 1976 | 1587 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -24 | -68 | 42.9% | -0.56 | 2–6 (25%) | 0–3 (0%) | 93.4 | +0.27 |
| 25 | 1987 | 1635 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | -10 | — | +22 | 43.4% | -0.35 | 3–4 (43%) | 10–7 (59%) | 102.4 | -1.15 | 1977 | 1869 | 146.4 | — | — | — | — | -101 | -197 | 0 | 62.5% | +0.89 | 15–7 (68%) | 6–5 (55%) | 112.6 | +0.69 |
| 26 | 1988 | 1591 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | +38 | 41.4% | -0.38 | 4–3 (57%) | 3–6 (33%) | 99.9 | +1.16 | 1978 | 1956 | 150.8 | — | — | — | — | +44 | -254 | -114 | 58.9% | +0.42 | 9–5 (64%) | 15–10 (60%) | 108.5 | -1.31 |
| 27 | 1989 | 1621 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -23 | — | +15 | 44.4% | -0.11 | 4–4 (50%) | 7–4 (64%) | 102.8 | -0.79 | 1979 | 1983 | 152.5 | — | — | — | — | +53 | -246 | -92 | 58.0% | +0.51 | 14–2 (88%) | 12–6 (67%) | 111.6 | -2.02 |
| 28 | 1990 | 1652 | 113.0 | — | — | — | — | -22 | — | -22 | 51.9% | -0.11 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–2 (50%) | 100.2 | -0.54 | 1980 | 1880 | 148.3 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | +22 | 56.7% | +0.43 | 8–9 (47%) | 10–11 (48%) | 94.1 | -3.86 |
| 29 | 1991 | 1643 | 108.2 | -0.83 | -4.21 | 0.649 | 43.6% | -23 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.25 | 1–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.02 | 1981 | 1868 | 150.9 | — | — | — | — | +30 | -139 | -33 | 55.2% | +0.51 | 9–6 (60%) | 9–12 (43%) | 98.3 | -4.50 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1729 | 145.3 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | +39 | 41.8% | -0.47 | 7–8 (47%) | 7–14 (33%) | 92.5 | -3.75 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1759 | 134.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -67 | +54 | 54.9% | +0.15 | 6–8 (43%) | 12–6 (67%) | 99.5 | +0.12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1613 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +73 | +194 | 41.2% | -0.58 | 5–8 (38%) | 9–6 (60%) | 97.8 | -1.08 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1585 | 121.6 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | +164 | 43.5% | -0.26 | 2–4 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 94.1 | +0.41 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1583 | 108.2 | — | — | — | — | -10 | — | — | 22.2% | -1.89 | — | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.44 |
| Career | — | 1710 | 127.9 | -0.83 | -4.21 | 0.649 | 43.6% | -19 | -50 | +21 | 44.9% | -0.31 | 33–48 (41%) | 58–58 (50%) | 100.6 | +0.80 | — | 2013 | 149.8 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -151 | +14 | 53.2% | +0.20 | 79–65 (55%) | 83–78 (52%) | 102.3 | -3.67 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 1, 1989 | H2H |
| Johan Kriek | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Jimmy Arias | 1 | 2 | 3 | Mar 7, 1990 | H2H |
| Paul Annacone | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Christo Van Rensburg | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 14, 1989 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terry Moor | 5 | 6 | 11 | Jan 31, 1985 | — |
| Brian Gottfried | 3 | 8 | 11 | Mar 29, 1984 | — |
| John McEnroe | 1 | 8 | 9 | Dec 8, 1983 | — |
| Hank Pfister | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jul 8, 1983 | — |
| Harold Solomon | 2 | 6 | 8 | May 1, 1982 | — |