H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Danie Visser vs Tomas Smid H2H: 0-2

Tomas Smid holds a 2–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tomas Smid leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Smid won the 1986 Swiss Indoors quarterfinal 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Danie Visser
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tomas Smid #67 6-3 6-2 Danie Visser #124 Match data Oct 18, 1986* QF Swiss Indoors ATP 250 Hard
Tomas Smid #16 6-2 7-5 Danie Visser #69 Match data Oct 12, 1984* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danie Visser Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1981 1–2 33.3% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0
22 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2
24 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4
25 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4
26 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6
27 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8
29 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danie Visser Tomas Smid
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1981 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4%
27 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
29 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3% — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danie Visser Tomas Smid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1981 1507 107.7 — — — — +43 — — 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1483 114.0 — — — — +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) — +1.20 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89
21 1983 1496 111.4 — — — — +39 -38 — 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.59 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24
22 1984 1618 134.7 — — — — -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.82 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34
23 1985 1643 120.9 — — — — -82 — +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.53 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69
24 1986 1676 124.7 — — — — -64 — +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.55 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22
25 1987 1635 124.7 — — — — -10 — +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) — -1.15 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40
26 1988 1591 112.9 — — — — -2 — +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.16 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62
27 1989 1621 129.7 — — — — -23 — +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.79 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90
28 1990 1652 113.0 — — — — -22 — -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.54 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32
29 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.02 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70
Career — 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80 — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.