H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Daniel Altmaier vs Elias Ymer H2H: 0-1
Elias Ymer holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Altmaier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elias Ymer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elias Ymer won the 2022 Bastad third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 27
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2023* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Daniel Altmaier | 7-6(5) 6-0 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2022* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Elias Ymer | 6-4 7-6(5) | Daniel Altmaier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Altmaier | #60 | #44 | 1,148 | 1,750 | 74 | 127 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Altmaier | Elias Ymer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #94 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #56 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2024 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #60 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |