H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Daniel Altmaier vs Hamad Medjedovic H2H: 2-1
Daniel Altmaier holds a 2–1 lead over Hamad Medjedovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Daniel Altmaier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Altmaier won the 2025 US Open first round 7-5 6-7 7-6 6-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 27
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Serbia
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2025* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daniel Altmaier | 7-5 6-7 7-6 6-7 6-4 | Hamad Medjedovic | Match data |
| May 31, 2025* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Daniel Altmaier | 4-6 6-3 6-3 6-2 | Hamad Medjedovic | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2025* | Grand Prix Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Hamad Medjedovic | 7-5 6-7 6-4 | Daniel Altmaier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Altmaier | #60 | #44 | 1,148 | 1,750 | 74 | 127 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hamad Medjedovic | #69 | #56 | 950 | 1,822 | 41 | 44 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Daniel Altmaier | Hamad Medjedovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #113 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #94 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #56 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #69 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #60 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |