H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Daniel Altmaier vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 1-0
Daniel Altmaier holds a 1–0 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Altmaier leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Altmaier won the 2021 Kitzbuhel fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 27
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2021* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Daniel Altmaier | 6-4 6-4 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
| May 16, 2021* | Geneva | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Marco Cecchinato | 6-1 7-6(5) | Daniel Altmaier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Altmaier | #60 | #44 | 1,148 | 1,750 | 74 | 127 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Altmaier | Marco Cecchinato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #94 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #56 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2025 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #60 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |