H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Daniel Altmaier vs Thiago Monteiro H2H: 0-1
Thiago Monteiro holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Altmaier in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Monteiro leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiago Monteiro won the 2022 Adelaide 1 third round 6-2 3-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Germany
Age 27
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 32
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2023 | Auckland | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Thiago Monteiro | 3-6 7-5 7-6(6) | Daniel Altmaier | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2022* | Adelaide 1 | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thiago Monteiro | 6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | Daniel Altmaier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Altmaier | #60 | #44 | 1,148 | 1,750 | 74 | 127 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiago Monteiro | #290 | #61 | 954 | 1,780 | 81 | 119 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Altmaier | Thiago Monteiro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #275 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #130 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #84 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 5–21 | 19.2% | #94 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #56 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #89 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #60 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #89 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #71 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #122 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #197 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #290 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |