H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Daniel Elsner vs Leander Paes H2H: 0-1
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Elsner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 2001 Wimbledon first round 6-0 6-1 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 47
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2001* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Leander Paes | 6-0 6-1 3-6 7-5 | Daniel Elsner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Elsner | #1,377 | #92 | 448 | 1,563 | 8 | 27 | 22.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Elsner | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #608 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #310 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #311 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #165 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #274 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |