H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniel Evans vs Bernard Tomic H2H: 3-0
Daniel Evans holds a 3–0 lead over Bernard Tomic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Evans leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2019 Stockholm third round 6-4 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Australia
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2019* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Oct 6, 2019* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Jan 22, 2017* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 7-5 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2013* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 1-6 6-3 7-6(4) 6-3 | Bernard Tomic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Bernard Tomic | #206 | #17 | 1,885 | 1,968 | 170 | 182 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Evans | Bernard Tomic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #286 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #208 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #56 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,726 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #83 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #185 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,613 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |