H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Daniel Evans vs Radu Albot H2H: 3-1
Daniel Evans holds a 3–1 lead over Radu Albot in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniel Evans leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2022 Tokyo third round 6-7(3) 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
Moldova
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2022* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2019* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 7-6(5) 5-7 6-2 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2019* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Daniel Evans | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Radu Albot | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2019* | Delray Beach | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Radu Albot | 3-6 6-3 7-6(7) | Daniel Evans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Radu Albot | #490 | #39 | 1,137 | 1,899 | 89 | 139 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Evans | Radu Albot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #168 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #46 | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #93 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #103 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #163 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |