H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Daniel Evans vs Steve Johnson H2H: 0-1
Steve Johnson holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Evans in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Johnson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2019 Winston-Salem third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2019* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-3 6-1 | Daniel Evans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Evans | Steve Johnson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |