H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Daniel Evans vs Taro Daniel H2H: 2-0
Daniel Evans holds a 2–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniel Evans leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Evans won the 2024 Almaty third round 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Great Britain
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2024* | Almaty | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 6-2 7-6(4) | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2022* | San Diego | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 6-4 6-4 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
| Dec 31, 2013* | Doha | ATP 250 | Q3 | Hard | Daniel Evans | 6-2 6-2 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Evans | #385 | #21 | 2,195 | 1,927 | 140 | 160 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Evans | Taro Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #305 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2016 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #66 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2017 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #133 | 1,820 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2020 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #32 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #25 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2022 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #27 | 1,850 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #38 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2024 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #164 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #185 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |