H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Chris Guccione

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Chris Guccione.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniel Munoz de la Nava
ESP Age 44 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Chris Guccione
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Guccione #272 6-4 6-3 Daniel Munoz de la Nava #148 Match data Mar 11, 2011* Q2 Q Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniel Munoz de la Nava #1,384 #68 732 1,761 9 28 24.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chris Guccione #986 #67 926 1,681 36 59 37.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Chris Guccione
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 2–2 50.0% #462 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–2 50.0% #281 1,540 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 3–3 50.0% #155 1,586 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2006 1–3 25.0% #153 1,543 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2007 8–15 34.8% #91 1,524 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2008 11–18 37.9% #96 1,560 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2009 7–8 46.7% #136 1,619 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #376 1,554 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2011 1–3 25.0% #256 1,584 0 0
26 2008 0–1 0.0% #179 1,532 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #570 1,644 0 0
27 2009 0–2 0.0% #216 1,585 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #520 1,640 0 0
28 2010 1–1 50.0% #147 1,621 0 0 2014 0–1 0.0% #980 1,664 0 0
29 2011 0–1 0.0% #140 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2012 3–4 42.9% #171 1,649 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2013 2–5 28.6% #194 1,698 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2014 0–1 0.0% #206 1,665 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2016 3–13 18.8% #351 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 37/37 of Daniel Munoz de la Nava's and 94/95 of Chris Guccione's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Chris Guccione
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/4 18.0 5.5 59.7% 83.3% 51.5% 76.8% 50.0% 70.5% 33.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/4 12.0 3.0 55.7% 84.5% 53.8% 74.2% 26.2% 71.2% 28.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 12.8 4.5 58.1% 76.4% 54.5% 33.9% 17.5% 67.3% 32.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 19.8 4.8 59.3% 76.5% 44.7% 58.0% 41.7% 63.5% 26.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 23/23 15.7 3.6 58.3% 78.3% 53.8% 65.4% 26.3% 68.0% 28.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 28/29 14.9 2.6 62.0% 79.7% 52.6% 72.1% 36.1% 69.4% 26.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 15/15 13.7 3.4 59.7% 79.1% 49.9% 67.5% 36.4% 67.8% 29.2%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 12.5 1.0 63.6% 74.2% 59.8% 65.0% 0.0% 69.6% 19.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 13.0 3.5 60.3% 80.8% 46.3% 82.6% 56.3% 67.3% 30.0%
26 2008 1/1 0.0 1.0 55.9% 54.5% 30.8% 50.0% 42.9% 44.1% 41.1% 2012 1/1 7.0 6.0 53.9% 68.8% 43.9% 20.0% 40.0% 57.3% 33.3%
27 2009 2/2 4.5 3.0 58.7% 79.8% 35.2% 14.3% 48.8% 62.0% 36.3% 2013 2/2 8.5 2.0 72.0% 90.6% 51.5% 50.0% 54.2% 79.0% 45.8%
28 2010 2/2 3.5 1.5 55.5% 69.6% 51.6% 63.9% 56.7% 61.8% 32.1% 2014 1/1 13.0 1.0 64.7% 81.8% 41.7% 66.7% 0.0% 67.6% 18.0%
29 2011 1/1 5.0 5.0 52.8% 53.2% 47.6% 41.7% 44.4% 50.6% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 7/7 1.0 3.1 58.0% 63.2% 44.0% 56.0% 47.4% 55.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 7/7 2.9 4.0 54.0% 69.2% 51.2% 59.6% 23.8% 60.8% 31.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1/1 4.0 7.0 61.7% 59.1% 48.8% 61.5% 66.7% 55.1% 29.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 16/16 3.5 4.3 58.2% 66.2% 50.5% 62.0% 35.1% 59.3% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37/37 2.9 3.8 57.1% 66.3% 48.0% 57.1% 38.5% 58.4% 35.9% — 94/95 14.6 3.3 60.1% 79.3% 51.9% 66.2% 33.1% 68.5% 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniel Munoz de la Nava Chris Guccione
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1483 106.2 +0.35 -0.92 1.125 52.1% — — — 60.0% +0.50 0–2 4–1 (80%) — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1540 116.2 +1.58 -2.45 0.978 50.0% +18 — — 50.0% +0.10 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.04
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1586 111.9 +2.37 -2.26 0.985 48.7% — — +20 42.1% -0.63 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.5 -0.21
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1543 108.6 +0.30 -2.26 0.719 46.7% -25 — — 20.0% -0.90 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.30
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1525 119.6 +2.74 -5.40 0.891 48.7% +37 -14 +27 40.3% -0.56 3–6 (33%) 11–11 (50%) 98.9 +0.16
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1560 127.5 +4.75 -7.05 0.870 48.4% +42 — -45 39.2% -0.72 4–4 (50%) 14–12 (54%) 104.4 0.00
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1619 133.1 +3.06 -3.98 0.906 49.1% +72 — — 47.2% -0.31 1–1 6–7 (46%) — +0.12
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1554 99.5 +0.96 -3.80 0.646 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.21
25 2007 1482 103.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1585 114.2 +0.83 -1.90 0.916 49.0% +83 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.34
26 2008 1533 109.1 -0.08 -4.07 0.734 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04 2012 1645 118.7 -1.04 -2.78 0.781 46.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.03
27 2009 1585 116.4 -1.87 -0.33 0.957 49.0% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.14 2013 1640 108.4 0.00 +0.05 2.183 61.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.18
28 2010 1622 114.8 -1.38 +2.12 0.841 46.5% — — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.03 2014 1665 108.1 +3.55 -2.62 0.557 44.2% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.14
29 2011 1582 112.3 +0.84 -1.89 0.845 46.1% — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.32 2015 1605 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2012 1650 128.4 -1.16 +1.19 0.964 49.3% — +75 — 41.2% -0.47 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2013 1699 128.4 -1.53 -1.91 0.813 46.9% -1 — — 30.0% -1.40 2–1 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2014 1665 113.3 -1.03 +0.40 0.665 45.4% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2015 1568 105.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2016 1509 118.8 -2.81 -1.89 0.853 46.8% +140 +10 — 31.8% -1.20 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 96.6 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1488 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1445 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1762 123.5 -1.91 -1.01 0.863 47.2% +62 +34 — 33.0% -1.14 6–12 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 +0.57 — 1682 125.4 +2.90 -4.66 0.907 48.9% +44 -14 +1 40.6% -0.54 11–19 (37%) 41–41 (50%) 100.6 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.