H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Dustin Brown H2H: 0-1
Dustin Brown holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dustin Brown leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dustin Brown won the 2016 Bastad third round 6-2 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
JAM
Age 41
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2016* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Dustin Brown | 6-2 7-6(6) | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dustin Brown | #1,058 | #64 | 778 | 1,903 | 61 | 96 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Dustin Brown | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #527 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #92 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #167 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #89 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #72 | 1,868 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #203 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |