H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Flavio Cipolla H2H: 1-0
Daniel Munoz de la Nava holds a 1–0 lead over Flavio Cipolla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Munoz de la Nava leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Munoz de la Nava won the 2012 Estoril fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2012* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | 6-4 6-4 | Flavio Cipolla | Match data |
| Jun 21, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Flavio Cipolla | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2010* | US Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | 6-3 3-6 7-5 | Flavio Cipolla | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2009* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | 7-6(6) 5-7 8-6 | Flavio Cipolla | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Flavio Cipolla | #543 | #70 | 736 | 1,786 | 35 | 66 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Flavio Cipolla | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #127 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #159 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #75 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #95 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #188 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |