H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Maximo Gonzalez H2H: 1-1
Daniel Munoz de la Nava and Maximo Gonzalez are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Maximo Gonzalez won the 2016 Marrakech third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2016* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Maximo Gonzalez | 6-1 6-4 | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2016* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Maximo Gonzalez | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2009* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | Q3 | Clay | Maximo Gonzalez | 7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maximo Gonzalez | #467 | #58 | 992 | 1,702 | 28 | 60 | 31.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Maximo Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #121 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #132 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #66 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #141 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #347 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #157 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #147 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #150 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #392 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |