H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Michael Berrer H2H: 1-0
Daniel Munoz de la Nava holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Berrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Munoz de la Nava leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Munoz de la Nava won the 2016 Kitzbuhel third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2016* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | 6-3 6-3 | Michael Berrer | Match data |
| Jan 5, 2015 | Doha | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Michael Berrer | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Berrer | #952 | #42 | 960 | 1,783 | 88 | 143 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Michael Berrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #152 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #100 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #182 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |