H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Daniele Bracciali vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0
Daniele Bracciali holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniele Bracciali leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniele Bracciali won the 2007 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2007* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Daniele Bracciali | 6-2 6-1 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniele Bracciali | #923 | #49 | 752 | 1,710 | 33 | 51 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniele Bracciali | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #950 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #258 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |