H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Daniele Bracciali vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0

Daniele Bracciali holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniele Bracciali leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniele Bracciali won the 2007 Indian Wells Open first round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniele Bracciali
ITA Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniele Bracciali #82 6-2 6-1 Justin Gimelstob #106 Match data Mar 7, 2007* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniele Bracciali #923 #49 752 1,711 33 51 39.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Justin Gimelstob #841 #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniele Bracciali Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1995 0–1 0.0% #950 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 1998 2–1 66.7% #207 1,538 0 0 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2004 1–2 33.3% #147 1,540 0 0 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2005 6–9 40.0% #81 1,635 0 0 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2006 18–24 42.9% #65 1,628 0 1 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2007 6–14 30.0% #258 1,578 0 1 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniele Bracciali Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1998 — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2004 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2005 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2006 5 11 16 31.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2007 4 8 12 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 9 21 30 30.0% 10 14 24 41.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 5 8 13 38.5% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 82/84 of Daniele Bracciali's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniele Bracciali Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1995 1/1 5.0 1.0 51.7% 63.3% 39.3% 33.3% 50.0% 51.7% 32.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 1998 2/3 11.0 4.5 52.3% 79.9% 47.7% 77.1% 18.2% 64.6% 34.2% 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 2004 3/3 8.0 3.7 57.7% 74.6% 48.0% 36.5% 37.8% 63.4% 34.1% 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2005 15/15 9.0 3.3 51.9% 76.2% 52.3% 57.3% 29.1% 64.6% 33.2% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2006 41/42 8.2 3.0 51.8% 75.2% 51.2% 67.1% 38.9% 63.6% 33.1% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2007 20/20 4.6 2.1 54.8% 68.2% 45.1% 60.5% 30.1% 57.7% 31.6% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
Career — 82/84 7.5 2.9 52.8% 73.6% 49.6% 62.4% 34.5% 62.2% 32.8% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.6% 38.2% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniele Bracciali Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1995 1484 97.8 -3.54 -2.94 0.663 42.6% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63
20 1998 1538 102.4 +0.57 +0.51 0.965 48.7% — — +113 50.0% +0.33 1–0 1–1 — +0.21 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32
25 2003 1535 103.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 2004 1541 101.5 -1.08 -0.19 0.930 48.5% — — — 36.4% -0.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.33 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70
27 2005 1635 121.8 +0.50 -0.85 0.937 48.9% -44 -85 +49 42.2% -0.62 3–2 (60%) 6–6 (50%) 103.6 -0.31 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 2006 1629 126.1 +0.86 -3.21 0.909 48.6% -94 -12 +102 43.3% -0.39 6–8 (43%) 8–9 (47%) 98.5 -0.14 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05
29 2007 1578 125.7 -2.80 -3.12 0.745 45.0% -15 -1 — 31.7% -1.56 — 4–3 (57%) — -0.63 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
36 2014 1559 95.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1712 123.5 -0.23 -2.55 0.867 47.7% -61 -25 +89 40.5% -0.65 11–10 (52%) 20–20 (50%) 104.2 -0.40 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.