H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniele Bracciali vs Raemon Sluiter H2H: 1-2
Raemon Sluiter holds a 2–1 lead over Daniele Bracciali in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on carpet, while Daniele Bracciali leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raemon Sluiter won the 2006 Auckland third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2006* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Raemon Sluiter | 6-3 6-4 | Daniele Bracciali | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2005* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Daniele Bracciali | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2004* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Raemon Sluiter | 7-5 6-4 | Daniele Bracciali | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniele Bracciali | #923 | #49 | 752 | 1,710 | 33 | 51 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniele Bracciali | Raemon Sluiter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #950 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #258 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |