H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniele Bracciali vs Robby Ginepri H2H: 1-0
Daniele Bracciali holds a 1–0 lead over Robby Ginepri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniele Bracciali leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniele Bracciali won the 2007 Rome Masters second round 7-5 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2007* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Daniele Bracciali | 7-5 7-6(2) | Robby Ginepri | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniele Bracciali | #923 | #49 | 752 | 1,710 | 33 | 51 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Robby Ginepri | #1,221 | #15 | 1,525 | 1,927 | 185 | 194 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniele Bracciali | Robby Ginepri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #950 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #32 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #15 | 1,882 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #51 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #134 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,814 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #100 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2005 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #144 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #311 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #258 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #287 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #214 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #223 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 |