H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 1-1
Daniil Medvedev and Andreas Seppi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2018 Basel fourth round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 42
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2018* | Basel | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Andreas Seppi | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2018* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | QF | Hard | Andreas Seppi | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Andreas Seppi | #1,188 | #18 | 1,895 | 1,977 | 363 | 397 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Andreas Seppi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #146 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #68 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #74 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #35 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2009 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #49 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2010 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2011 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2012 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #23 | 1,921 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2013 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #25 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2014 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #29 | 1,870 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #87 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #37 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #72 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #102 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #354 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |