H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 19:16 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Andrey Kuznetsov H2H: 1-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 1–0 lead over Andrey Kuznetsov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2017 Moscow third round 6-4 2-6 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2017* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 2-6 7-6(6) | Andrey Kuznetsov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Andrey Kuznetsov | #1,435 | #39 | 1,093 | 1,952 | 72 | 100 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Andrey Kuznetsov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #301 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #231 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #78 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2014 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2015 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2016 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,899 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2017 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #107 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #517 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #441 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1369 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |