H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Daniil Medvedev holds a 4–1 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 4–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Botic van de Zandschulp won the 2026 Canadian Open second round 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 6-3 7-6(5) | Daniil Medvedev | Match data | Aug 5, 2026 | R64 | Canadian Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Daniil Medvedev | 6-2 6-2 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Feb 17, 2023* | R16 | ABN AMRO Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Aug 17, 2022* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 6-4 6-2 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Jan 23, 2022* | R32 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 6-0 4-6 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Sep 9, 2021* | QF | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,280 | 434 | 187 | 69.9% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #70 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 120 | 122 | 49.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,180 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #2 | 2,239 | 1 | 13 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,060 | 1 | 15 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,161 | 1 | 20 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 46–19 | 70.8% | #5 | 2,090 | 1 | 20 | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 33–15 | 68.8% | #8 | 1,885 | 1 | 23 | 2026 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #70 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 20 | 2016 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 14 | 15 | 29 | 48.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 36 | 14 | 50 | 72.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 45 | 13 | 58 | 77.6% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 24 | 7 | 31 | 77.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 41 | 8 | 49 | 83.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2022 | 31 | 13 | 44 | 70.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | 2023 | 50 | 12 | 62 | 80.6% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 29 | 12 | 41 | 70.7% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | 2025 | 31 | 16 | 47 | 66.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | 2026 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2026 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 326 | 120 | 446 | 73.1% | 51 | 39 | 90 | 56.7% | 57 | 28 | 85 | 67.1% | — | 76 | 76 | 152 | 50.0% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 609/622 of Daniil Medvedev's and 241/243 of Botic van de Zandschulp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | 2016 | 10/10 | 5.4 | 2.0 | 59.9% | 71.2% | 46.0% | 52.1% | 43.8% | 61.5% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 45/45 | 7.3 | 4.0 | 60.6% | 71.5% | 49.0% | 59.7% | 42.9% | 62.9% | 35.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 63/64 | 6.8 | 3.8 | 57.6% | 74.4% | 51.1% | 63.9% | 41.2% | 64.7% | 36.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 79/79 | 8.7 | 3.2 | 59.8% | 76.4% | 55.9% | 54.9% | 45.9% | 68.2% | 41.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 33/33 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 61.6% | 79.0% | 55.4% | 66.1% | 44.5% | 70.3% | 40.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 62/66 | 9.5 | 3.0 | 62.7% | 79.2% | 54.1% | 59.7% | 46.6% | 69.7% | 41.8% | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% |
| 26 | 2022 | 60/60 | 9.2 | 4.0 | 64.6% | 76.5% | 51.3% | 67.8% | 47.6% | 67.6% | 40.6% | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% |
| 27 | 2023 | 84/85 | 7.0 | 4.1 | 64.5% | 76.2% | 50.8% | 62.5% | 46.8% | 67.0% | 41.5% | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% |
| 28 | 2024 | 62/65 | 6.9 | 4.8 | 61.2% | 73.1% | 49.9% | 57.7% | 46.1% | 64.3% | 39.9% | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% |
| 29 | 2025 | 64/66 | 8.3 | 4.3 | 62.3% | 76.2% | 51.4% | 52.7% | 38.3% | 66.6% | 40.6% | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% |
| 30 | 2026 | 47/49 | 7.7 | 4.1 | 65.3% | 73.8% | 48.4% | 61.4% | 43.2% | 65.1% | 40.9% | 2026 | 39/40 | 6.8 | 4.8 | 62.0% | 73.3% | 45.7% | 64.1% | 46.5% | 62.9% | 38.8% |
| Career | — | 609/622 | 8.0 | 3.8 | 62.0% | 75.6% | 51.7% | 60.1% | 44.5% | 66.6% | 40.1% | — | 241/243 | 6.1 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.7% | 47.2% | 59.5% | 41.0% | 62.3% | 37.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2013 | 1484 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1487 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 1508 | 108.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 1686 | 125.7 | -0.92 | +1.52 | 1.091 | 51.8% | -58 | -63 | — | 47.8% | +0.39 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 1740 | 146.3 | -0.73 | +0.04 | 0.954 | 49.5% | -69 | -182 | +107 | 48.6% | -0.11 | 10–6 (63%) | 10–7 (59%) | — | +0.25 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 2034 | 157.6 | +1.04 | +1.47 | 1.046 | 50.9% | +11 | -502 | -192 | 59.6% | +0.40 | 13–8 (62%) | 11–9 (55%) | — | -1.36 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 2127 | 174.7 | +4.17 | +5.57 | 1.295 | 54.1% | +39 | -430 | -272 | 70.3% | +1.22 | 9–11 (45%) | 23–10 (70%) | — | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2020 | 2180 | 169.6 | +6.03 | +3.69 | 1.347 | 54.2% | +45 | — | — | 67.0% | +1.30 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -0.98 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2021 | 2239 | 172.8 | +6.07 | +5.71 | 1.378 | 55.1% | +60 | -456 | -284 | 73.4% | +1.60 | 13–5 (72%) | 10–11 (48%) | — | -1.39 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | — | -0.41 |
| 26 | 2022 | 2061 | 170.2 | +3.94 | +4.83 | 1.253 | 54.0% | +76 | -213 | -40 | 70.9% | +1.29 | 3–9 (25%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -0.62 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | — | -1.63 |
| 27 | 2023 | 2162 | 177.0 | +4.02 | +6.16 | 1.258 | 54.0% | +62 | -194 | -88 | 71.4% | +1.44 | 14–6 (70%) | 16–15 (52%) | — | -3.49 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | — | +0.41 |
| 28 | 2024 | 2091 | 167.2 | +1.18 | +4.88 | 1.118 | 52.0% | +49 | -130 | +43 | 64.1% | +0.74 | 11–4 (73%) | 20–8 (71%) | — | -1.43 | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | — | -2.47 |
| 29 | 2025 | 1951 | 157.6 | +2.07 | +4.31 | 1.216 | 53.1% | +40 | -8 | +114 | 60.6% | +0.85 | 14–12 (54%) | 14–16 (47%) | — | +3.07 | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | — | -1.80 |
| 30 | 2026 | 1885 | 156.4 | +0.74 | +4.97 | 1.172 | 52.8% | +120 | +14 | +122 | 63.9% | +1.01 | 8–7 (53%) | 6–13 (32%) | — | +1.68 | 2026 | 1767 | 145.3 | -1.15 | +2.62 | 1.048 | 51.1% | +45 | -62 | -126 | 55.0% | +0.31 | 4–8 (33%) | 15–10 (60%) | — | -0.29 |
| Career | — | 2280 | 170.5 | +2.86 | +4.34 | 1.200 | 53.1% | +44 | -214 | -48 | 65.6% | +1.01 | 104–74 (58%) | 132–106 (55%) | 101.1 | -0.61 | — | 1933 | 148.6 | -0.95 | +1.97 | 1.004 | 50.0% | +8 | -47 | -84 | 48.7% | -0.07 | 38–38 (50%) | 61–53 (54%) | 105.1 | -2.56 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander Zverev | 13 | 8 | 21 | Nov 1, 2025 | H2H |
| Jannik Sinner | 7 | 10 | 17 | May 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Stefanos Tsitsipas | 10 | 5 | 15 | Feb 18, 2026 | H2H |
| Novak Djokovic | 5 | 8 | 13 | Sep 10, 2023 | H2H |
| Grigor Dimitrov | 9 | 3 | 12 | Oct 30, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |