H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniil Medvedev vs Dominik Koepfer H2H: 4-0
Daniil Medvedev holds a 4–0 lead over Dominik Koepfer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniil Medvedev leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2024 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
Germany
Age 32
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2024* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Daniil Medvedev | 6-3 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Dominik Koepfer | Match data |
| Mar 27, 2024* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 7-6(5) 6-0 | Dominik Koepfer | Match data |
| Sep 2, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 6-1 6-2 | Dominik Koepfer | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 3-6 6-3 6-2 7-6(2) | Dominik Koepfer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
| Dominik Koepfer | #508 | #49 | 1,207 | 1,806 | 54 | 71 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniil Medvedev | Dominik Koepfer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 | 2020 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 | 2021 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #54 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 | 2022 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #199 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 | 2023 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #77 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 | 2024 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #102 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #509 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |