H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Daniil Medvedev vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 3-1

Daniil Medvedev holds a 3–1 lead over Fernando Verdasco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Daniil Medvedev leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniil Medvedev won the 2019 Queen's Club Championships round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniil Medvedev
Russia Age 30 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniil Medvedev #13 6-2 6-4 Fernando Verdasco #37 Match data Jun 20, 2019* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP 500 Grass
Daniil Medvedev #16 6-2 7-5 Fernando Verdasco #26 Match data Feb 15, 2019* R16 ABN AMRO Open ATP 500 Hard
Fernando Verdasco #34 6-4 6-1 Daniil Medvedev #52 Match data Jun 15, 2018* R16 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass
Daniil Medvedev #63 6-3 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #40 Match data Feb 10, 2017* R16 Montpellier Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniil Medvedev #8 #1 10,780 2,280 436 187 70.0% 1 6 1 5 10 23
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,127 549 442 55.4% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniil Medvedev Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,591 0 0
20 2016 5–5 50.0% #99 1,685 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,730 0 1
21 2017 22–23 48.9% #65 1,739 0 0 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,790 0 1
22 2018 41–23 64.1% #16 2,033 0 3 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2019 58–21 73.4% #5 2,126 0 7 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2020 24–9 72.7% #4 2,180 0 9 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,875 0 2
25 2021 53–13 80.3% #2 2,239 1 13 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,003 0 3
26 2022 42–18 70.0% #7 2,060 1 15 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,927 0 5
27 2023 67–18 78.8% #3 2,161 1 20 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,931 0 5
28 2024 46–19 70.8% #5 2,090 1 20 2012 32–22 59.3% #24 1,901 0 5
29 2025 43–23 65.2% #13 1,950 1 21 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,896 0 5
30 2026 35–15 70.0% #8 1,909 1 23 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,879 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,823 0 7
33 — — — — — — — 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,914 0 7
35 — — — — — — — 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniil Medvedev Fernando Verdasco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2004 6 10 16 37.5% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2017 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2005 14 12 26 53.8% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 2018 36 14 50 72.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2019 45 13 58 77.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2007 18 14 32 56.3% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
24 2020 24 7 31 77.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 20 16 36 55.6% 17 8 25 68.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
25 2021 41 8 49 83.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2009 35 15 50 70.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
26 2022 31 13 44 70.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2010 21 13 34 61.8% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2023 50 12 62 80.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2011 19 14 33 57.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2024 29 12 41 70.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2012 11 10 21 52.4% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 2025 31 16 47 66.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 12 9 21 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2026 24 8 32 75.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2014 11 11 22 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 11 14 25 44.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 15 28 46.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 18 15 33 54.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 18 14 32 56.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 13 14 27 48.1% 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 328 120 448 73.2% 51 39 90 56.7% 57 28 85 67.1% — — — — — 259 235 494 52.4% 231 156 387 59.7% 51 44 95 53.7% 8 7 15 53.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 611/624 of Daniil Medvedev's and 988/991 of Fernando Verdasco's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniil Medvedev Fernando Verdasco
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 1.7 6.3 71.8% 56.3% 32.1% 54.4% 39.3% 49.7% 37.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 18/19 5.0 4.3 64.8% 68.3% 55.7% 51.0% 42.6% 63.8% 34.4%
20 2016 10/10 5.4 2.0 59.9% 71.2% 46.0% 52.1% 43.8% 61.5% 42.0% 2004 56/56 4.8 3.2 66.0% 71.0% 56.3% 65.5% 40.6% 65.7% 37.3%
21 2017 45/45 7.3 4.0 60.6% 71.5% 49.0% 59.7% 42.9% 62.9% 35.4% 2005 61/61 6.6 3.7 65.1% 72.5% 51.7% 60.0% 44.5% 65.2% 38.9%
22 2018 63/64 6.8 3.8 57.6% 74.4% 51.1% 63.9% 41.2% 64.7% 36.9% 2006 56/56 3.9 3.8 72.5% 68.7% 49.7% 62.8% 43.6% 63.3% 38.3%
23 2019 79/79 8.7 3.2 59.8% 76.4% 55.9% 54.9% 45.9% 68.2% 41.2% 2007 59/59 4.6 3.4 72.4% 70.2% 52.2% 55.3% 38.6% 65.1% 38.2%
24 2020 33/33 9.4 2.6 61.6% 79.0% 55.4% 66.1% 44.5% 70.3% 40.1% 2008 72/72 3.8 4.1 72.6% 69.3% 53.0% 55.6% 47.6% 64.7% 40.8%
25 2021 62/66 9.5 3.0 62.7% 79.2% 54.1% 59.7% 46.6% 69.7% 41.8% 2009 75/75 6.1 3.7 69.1% 73.1% 54.3% 62.2% 46.5% 67.1% 41.1%
26 2022 60/60 9.2 4.0 64.6% 76.5% 51.3% 67.8% 47.6% 67.6% 40.6% 2010 64/64 5.4 4.8 67.1% 71.2% 49.4% 60.0% 44.6% 64.0% 40.3%
27 2023 84/85 7.0 4.1 64.5% 76.2% 50.8% 62.5% 46.8% 67.0% 41.5% 2011 58/58 5.5 3.9 68.8% 70.7% 51.3% 61.5% 44.9% 64.6% 38.1%
28 2024 62/65 6.9 4.8 61.2% 73.1% 49.9% 57.7% 46.1% 64.3% 39.9% 2012 53/54 4.6 3.8 69.7% 69.7% 51.4% 64.4% 42.1% 64.1% 38.3%
29 2025 64/66 8.3 4.3 62.3% 76.2% 51.4% 52.7% 38.3% 66.6% 40.6% 2013 50/51 5.9 5.0 61.7% 72.8% 54.0% 56.4% 36.3% 65.3% 37.4%
30 2026 49/51 7.8 4.2 65.6% 74.1% 48.3% 61.9% 43.8% 65.3% 41.0% 2014 46/46 5.7 4.7 66.3% 71.7% 51.8% 65.6% 43.2% 64.5% 37.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 50/50 7.7 4.1 64.6% 73.5% 52.3% 60.8% 35.2% 66.1% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 55/55 6.3 3.9 64.0% 73.2% 51.4% 62.1% 38.4% 65.1% 37.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 54/54 4.0 3.4 69.0% 70.6% 51.0% 53.7% 45.7% 64.6% 39.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 61/61 6.7 4.2 63.1% 72.0% 48.7% 59.3% 42.9% 63.4% 39.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 53/53 7.7 3.7 63.8% 71.8% 49.4% 62.4% 40.0% 63.7% 36.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 13/13 6.3 2.6 67.5% 68.9% 49.5% 59.7% 29.5% 62.7% 36.4%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 10/10 3.9 3.2 66.9% 60.7% 48.4% 54.2% 28.3% 56.6% 35.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 16/16 4.3 2.9 63.4% 66.0% 48.6% 58.4% 37.6% 59.8% 36.2%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 1.0 4.0 62.6% 53.7% 32.4% 36.3% 45.3% 45.6% 34.0%
Career — 611/624 8.0 3.8 62.0% 75.6% 51.7% 60.1% 44.5% 66.6% 40.1% — 988/991 5.5 3.9 67.3% 70.9% 51.6% 59.9% 42.1% 64.4% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniil Medvedev Fernando Verdasco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2013 1484 95.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2014 1487 101.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1502 102.0 -2.56 -2.05 0.736 44.2% — +27 — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — +0.02
19 2015 1508 108.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1592 125.8 +1.64 -0.91 0.950 48.7% +9 -89 — 39.6% -0.77 2–4 (33%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 -0.48
20 2016 1686 125.7 -0.92 +1.52 1.091 51.8% -58 -63 — 47.8% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.68 2004 1731 140.6 +2.76 +0.54 1.085 51.4% -84 +24 -92 53.2% +0.29 6–8 (43%) 11–12 (48%) 100.4 -1.34
21 2017 1740 146.3 -0.73 +0.04 0.954 49.5% -69 -182 +107 48.6% -0.11 10–6 (63%) 10–7 (59%) 105.3 +0.25 2005 1791 146.9 +2.51 +2.36 1.116 51.9% -27 +11 -149 55.1% +0.46 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) 100.7 -2.07
22 2018 2034 157.6 +1.04 +1.47 1.046 50.9% +11 -502 -192 59.6% +0.40 13–8 (62%) 11–9 (55%) 105.2 -1.36 2006 1727 137.0 +0.96 +1.48 1.042 50.6% -72 +110 +30 56.5% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 14–10 (58%) 101.8 +0.48
23 2019 2127 174.7 +4.17 +5.57 1.295 54.1% +39 -430 -272 70.3% +1.22 9–11 (45%) 23–10 (70%) 105.1 -0.18 2007 1864 150.9 +2.40 +2.23 1.097 51.3% -58 -13 -91 54.4% +0.38 11–10 (52%) 10–14 (42%) 101.0 -1.77
24 2020 2180 169.6 +6.03 +3.69 1.347 54.2% +45 — — 67.0% +1.30 7–3 (70%) 5–5 (50%) 103.1 -0.98 2008 1876 151.0 +1.44 +3.82 1.154 52.4% -51 +93 +36 58.0% +0.69 13–9 (59%) 13–14 (48%) 101.8 +1.79
25 2021 2239 172.8 +6.07 +5.71 1.378 55.1% +60 -456 -284 73.4% +1.60 13–5 (72%) 10–11 (48%) 98.2 -1.39 2009 2004 172.3 +4.14 +5.15 1.247 53.9% +20 +44 -100 66.0% +1.22 11–12 (48%) 15–19 (44%) 96.0 -0.23
26 2022 2061 170.2 +3.94 +4.83 1.253 54.0% +76 -213 -40 70.9% +1.29 3–9 (25%) 16–9 (64%) 93.6 -0.62 2010 1928 161.5 +1.35 +3.83 1.119 52.0% +11 +172 — 59.1% +0.69 18–5 (78%) 17–17 (50%) 104.3 +1.41
27 2023 2162 177.0 +4.02 +6.16 1.258 54.0% +62 -194 -88 71.4% +1.44 14–6 (70%) 16–15 (52%) 101.4 -3.49 2011 1931 156.9 +1.76 +2.02 1.077 51.0% -19 +115 -49 55.4% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 9–10 (47%) 97.4 -0.03
28 2024 2091 167.2 +1.18 +4.88 1.118 52.0% +49 -130 +43 64.1% +0.74 11–4 (73%) 20–8 (71%) 109.2 -1.43 2012 1902 158.3 +1.78 +1.64 1.068 50.9% -15 +110 -16 57.3% +0.45 7–6 (54%) 10–11 (48%) 96.5 +0.32
29 2025 1951 157.6 +2.07 +4.31 1.216 53.1% +40 -8 +114 60.6% +0.85 14–12 (54%) 14–16 (47%) 92.1 +3.07 2013 1897 150.8 +1.90 +1.27 1.077 50.9% -69 +47 +113 54.3% +0.20 11–12 (48%) 14–10 (58%) 102.3 -0.19
30 2026 1909 156.5 +0.97 +5.06 1.182 52.9% +114 -9 +100 65.6% +1.09 8–7 (53%) 6–13 (32%) 89.9 +2.06 2014 1880 147.7 +0.99 +0.74 1.048 50.8% -58 +69 +74 55.4% +0.36 11–12 (48%) 12–16 (43%) 94.8 +1.67
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1822 158.0 +2.13 -0.07 1.043 50.6% -12 +53 +115 47.4% +0.18 12–11 (52%) 13–16 (45%) 97.0 -2.42
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1823 157.6 +1.70 +1.52 1.083 51.2% -31 +108 +59 53.3% +0.30 6–12 (33%) 15–12 (56%) 97.7 -1.95
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1896 164.3 +0.98 +3.38 1.115 51.7% -12 +46 -99 55.4% +0.30 6–15 (29%) 18–9 (67%) 98.6 -2.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1915 159.9 -0.10 +2.46 1.065 50.9% +25 +13 -172 51.9% +0.27 15–11 (58%) 8–17 (32%) 94.6 -1.33
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1810 151.6 -0.18 +0.45 0.990 50.1% +22 +37 +5 51.4% +0.28 13–13 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 96.5 -0.47
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1768 132.5 -0.34 -1.01 0.975 49.0% +72 — — 48.5% -0.27 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1627 114.6 -2.83 -1.10 0.807 46.0% — +81 — 25.0% -1.25 — 1–2 (33%) — -0.25
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1604 122.9 -3.29 -0.30 0.900 48.1% +74 +90 — 36.6% -0.81 2–4 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 98.8 +0.75
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1536 96.8 -6.12 -1.90 0.625 40.2% +105 — — 9.1% -3.27 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.03
Career — 2280 170.4 +2.87 +4.35 1.200 53.1% +44 -216 -50 65.7% +1.01 104–74 (58%) 132–106 (55%) 101.1 -0.55 — 2128 158.8 +1.50 +2.00 1.077 51.2% -17 +67 -9 54.3% +0.35 175–178 (50%) 214–226 (49%) 97.0 -0.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.